Re:Astra can read and write weights to improve Qwen
by user43928 on Monday November 02, 2026 @02:56PM
(#50342737)
Yes, this is hardly a shocker to anyone who used the latest models to convert/optimize AI models.
The other day I was thinking about the definition of AGI.
I was asking myself the question that when there is no form of data that I can think of throwing into Claude Code and have it not come up with some sort of intelligent answer about it, is that already general intelligence?
Re:Astra can read and write weights to improve Qwen
by marktl on Monday November 02, 2026 @04:00PM
(#50343669)
IMO yes
Re:Astra can read and write weights to improve Qwen
by rsalus on Monday November 02, 2026 @04:15PM
(#50343866)
general knowledge perhaps, but certainly not intelligence in any traditional sense
Re:Astra can read and write weights to improve Qwen
by cman1444 on Tuesday November 03, 2026 @12:57AM
(#50348583)
Why not? What is the differentiator?
Re:Astra can read and write weights to improve Qwen
by dist-epoch on Monday November 02, 2026 @04:19PM
(#50343909)
And yet you ask it 3 times to not do a thing, and it does it in a 4th way. A human doesn't fail in this way. And I'm not talking about memory here, single context.
So yeah, it can do everything, but fails in trivial ways around the doing part.
Re:Astra can read and write weights to improve Qwen
by whattheheckheck on Monday November 02, 2026 @04:54PM
(#50344377)
Others have though much deeper about this its all documented in academic papers and books
This sort of throws a wrench in the whole "stochastic parrot" idea...
I am not surprised, though I expect many to be.