cman1444
https://shoppress.dormanproducts.com/hunting-tooth-gearsets/
https://shoppress.dormanproducts.com/hunting-tooth-gearsets/
There is limited public attention. Wasting it on such a minor infraction is unwise. Much better to focus on more egregious examples of corporate wrongdoing.
If a medium/small country deemed it a threat to rely on US/China for AI capabilities, they can get 95% of the utility by banning all American and Chinese models and just using local ones.
This contrasts to something like oil or nukes, where if you're not one of the countries blessed with them, you have a serious power imbalance.
Both are strawman arguments, so my mistake on mine.
Likewise, others are free to criticize your criticism.
My point is it's silly to be upset about others charging for products that are easily vibe coded. If it's that easy to make, and they are charging too much, then someone else (it could even be you!) will come along and undercut them.
That's the analogous equivalent of spending the tokens to use AI to make this project.
The analogous equivalent of growing a potato yourself over months would be creating this website without AI.
You're not entitled to dictate what someone else charges for their product, no matter how easy it is to make.
Surely an AI could consider the human's needs, wants, and interests, and then provide a likely candidate for a good question.
I don't understand why there seems to be a fundamental limitation on that front.
The cost to watch a movie today through streaming is not more than it was when you had to go to a movie theater to see one.
The cost to buy and sell financial instruments today through Robinhood or similar products is not more than when you had to have a broker to place orders for you.
The cost to find vast amounts of information through search engines is negligible today. To do so previously would take immense amounts of time, effort, and money parsing through encyclopedias is the information even existed at the time.
The cost to print a few drafts of a memo today requires a single session typing into Microsoft word and then printing to your office printer. Previously you had to pay a typist to put together multiple drafts for you.
On autonomous vehicles:
Yes they will absolutely be cheaper, as long as a complete monopoly is avoided. It's not just that you don't have to pay the driver. You also will have vastly lower insurance rates due to how safe they are. Maintenance costs will be lower due to economies of scale when fleet operators can have the car deliver itself to a dedicated massive maintenance facility.
Living standards would be a lot worse today if we still had to pick crops in the field by hand.
1 : studious inquiry or examination especially : investigation or experimentation aimed at the discovery and interpretation of facts, revision of accepted theories or laws in the light of new facts, or practical application of such new or revised theories or laws
2 : the collecting of information about a particular subject
3 : careful or diligent search
Nothing here requires human understanding to be the goal. In fact, it explicitly calls out "practical applications" as one of the purposes that can be aimed at.
The whole field of applied mathematics is for the purpose of finding practical applications. Therefore any research conducted in this field is not for the exclusive purpose of human understanding or knowledge.
I'm not complaining, you're just restricting the definition of mathematics research in order to discredit what the AI labs have achieved.
Many modern medicines do not have understood mechanisms of action, yet we know they work. Are the people who found them not conducting drug research?
Do we even have a different term for what the AI labs are conducting if it's not mathematical research?
Additionally, I would argue that any work that adds to the total corpus of known facts increases human understanding, even if the path to get to each fact isn't understood. It's hard to argue we'd be better off with less total information.
All mathematics researchers in the whole world have agreed upon that objective apparently?