Re:Incident with Actions, Pull Requests and Issues
by Traubenfuchs on Monday October 12, 2026 @11:19AM
(#50057716)
Why not separate systems between paying customers and free tier vibecode slopsters?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Incident with Actions, Pull Requests and Issues
by saltcured on Monday October 12, 2026 @11:58AM
(#50058309)
Presumably, they still want the free tier to help acquire new customers?
You could say they should separate the human users from the slopsters in any tier. This could be done with some quota/rate limiting model.
But, if they are either on the fence or believing that agent-based development is the way forward, then that new reality is the one they would need to support. Cutting it off will send those customers elsewhere.
And, if you've managed to handle the new workload, it is basically in the noise to also handle artisanal human developers in the background on the same solution...
Re:Incident with Actions, Pull Requests and Issues
by ktm5j on Monday October 12, 2026 @11:35AM
(#50057939)
They have that. I might be wrong, but I don't think they're having these issues with their enterprise offering.
Re:Incident with Actions, Pull Requests and Issues
by tom1337 on Monday October 12, 2026 @11:41AM
(#50058028)
Enterprise is the highest tier of paying tho. Our company is working on the Team plan is pretty much affected by each and every of those outages.
Re:Incident with Actions, Pull Requests and Issues
by dannyw on Monday October 12, 2026 @11:56AM
(#50058259)
Enterprise is $21/seat/month, could consider upgrading? Not that it should be needed; but it’s not that expensive.