Re:How California Closed the Montana License Plate Loophole
by joshblack1982 on Wednesday October 07, 2026 @12:16PM
(#49994889)
Did he have a history of violence, or was there some good reason to send armed men to his place? If not, this is just a waste of resources, and also adding many armed men into the situation made it more likely for things to turn deadly.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:How California Closed the Montana License Plate Loophole
by splicebot on Wednesday October 07, 2026 @12:54PM
(#49995466)
US law enforcement are always armed by default. It would be shocking if they actually showed up unarmed. Possibly negligent and a firing offense.
Re:How California Closed the Montana License Plate Loophole
by hellojesus on Wednesday October 07, 2026 @01:18PM
(#49995832)
Is there no policy of calling someone without a history of violence (or showing up to inform with no intention of on-the-spot arrest) to let them know they are in violation of the law and request they turn themselves in within the next X days if there is no reason to assume evidence could be destroyed by the person during that time?
Re:How California Closed the Montana License Plate Loophole
by scoofy on Wednesday October 07, 2026 @01:26PM
(#49995955)
Why would there ever be a “no reason to assume evidence could be destroyed”?
The evidence of knowingly evading taxes is likely in encrypted text messages and emails that can be trivially destroyed.
Re:How California Closed the Montana License Plate Loophole
by suburban_strike on Wednesday October 07, 2026 @02:54PM
(#49997227)
No. It gives people time to plan an escape.
Re:How California Closed the Montana License Plate Loophole
by NetMageSCW on Wednesday October 07, 2026 @07:05PM
(#49999972)
Since the police should assume they are innocent, that shouldn’t be a consideration.
Re:How California Closed the Montana License Plate Loophole
by kube-system on Thursday October 08, 2026 @01:51PM
(#50009290)
The standard of a police arrest in the US is probable cause that the person has committed a crime.