> No attempts to monetize have been made or will be made

I'm disappointed. A true commitment to the bit would involve a shitcoin rugpull or some attempt to frontrun the news of a crisis you manufactured.

>> No attempts to monetize have been made or will be made

> I'm disappointed.

So am I.

A true fan of the movie would have remembered the following quote: "money? ... [thinks hard for a couple of seconds and then remembers] ... I like money!"

[EDIT]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZHCVyllnck

GLM deserves the ninth Guinness. It’s beautiful.

Opened it on my phone first thing this morning and kept clicking around to find the actual content before I realized I was looking at it.

I find it doubly absurd that we can no longer be bothered to write 1990s style absurdist satire by hand and we outsource the absurdism to an LLM.

I doubt the author would have made something worth posting (much less something that hit #1) if he had attempted to make this by hand while drinking 6 guinness

In my book, "I didn't make it, I was getting hammered instead" is really not that much of a flex.

Your book doesn’t seem very amusing.

Yes, look at what the president of the us accomplishes, he's our leading teetotaler. Hmm, evidence is pointing in one direction here.

That's why nobody reads your book

Sturgeon's law will need to be revised in the AI age.

At first glance I thought it was cool and someone had made it by hand.

Then certain things like hard to view content and scrolling that doesn't work made me realize it's just more vibe coded junk.

Like what really is the point? It sounds like the owner had almost zero creative input.

I have in mind something like this, but it's a unix pipe

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Treachery_of_Images

I apologize for not personally writing a quarter million responses to user prompts.

This is what I love about the agentic era the most. It gives us highly functioning alcoholics the ability to drink and work at the same time! -thisisajokeorisit-

Not really, the Ballmer Peak always existed, agents just shift the curve upwards up by a few standard deviations.

> a few standard deviations

I’ve been wondering recently if it’s time for someone to revisit this study to see how it holds up with agents https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.10002

Along which axis?

What was the Guiness budget?

Maybe I should have sent you a Guinness last night after I saw the website.

Ooh, instead I should vibe code a website and service that will send a Guinness to a hacker who is working on their own vibe coded service, kind of a perfect recursive circle! LLM, please write my book, "Godel, Escher, Guinness, an Eternal Dark River of Achievement".

Immediately after completing this, I heard a knock on my door from the dark forces of Alcohol Beverage Control, they were trying to get in, along with my HR team, my copyright lawyer, and weirdly my ex-wife were all here to tell me this was a bad idea.

I chuckled.

As a side note, that particular model is extremely abliterated, although it's almost certainly wrong, it'll attempt to give you an entire setup plan for a meth lab if you ask it. Or something similarly naughty as a test.

This sort of absurdist satire with the right system prompt is a near perfect use case for it since it'll happily cooperate with just about anything. And yet it's big enough to be able to write coherently and provide a reasonable answer.

I think it scores like 0 out of 460 on a test of known "bad" prompts that most LLM will refuse.