News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

ur-whale

Re:Resisting Cognitive Surrender on Tuesday November 03, 2026 @03:26AM (#50349477)
> Resisting Cognitive Surrender

The economics of the whole affair unfortunately point squarely in the opposite direction.

Re:European RISC-V Industrial Computing Initiative on Tuesday November 03, 2026 @03:22AM (#50349441)
> European RISC-V Industrial Computing Initiative > Based in Europe, open worldwide

So European, right?

I'm immediately thinking, there's got to be some sovereignty aspect to the initiative. Right?

But, if you look at the "The silicon is here." section and dig a little:

> "Shenzhen MilkV Technology Co., Ltd" [1]

[1]: https://milkv.io/about

Wake me up when someone can actually build a computer from scratch with EU-made parts in 2026.

Re:Mathematics has changed. Let's act like it on Sunday November 01, 2026 @02:33PM (#50328876)
Wake me up when AI solves Collatz.
Re:Binance-hacker-1029 – $5.6B stolen from Binance on Friday October 30, 2026 @04:36AM (#50301225)
My take: unless they're a sovereign-backed team (North Korea, Russia, Iran, etc...the usual suspects) the hackers are very likely to get caught given:

a) The amounts stolen

b) The very poor uncensorability and anonymity guarantees offered by the kind of crypto they stole

Regarding uncensorability, some of these cryptos score so bad on that axis that the stolen goods can likely be recovered by a simple decision from the folks who manage/own the chain.

Re:Binance-hacker-1029 – $5.6B stolen from Binance on Friday October 30, 2026 @04:32AM (#50301193)
> It seems better when it's on an exchange like Binance, because they cover you when it gets stolen.

Assuming they actually can cover the losses financially.

And if they don't good luck suing them.

Re:Formlabs Studio 1 $699 Resin Printer on Thursday October 29, 2026 @05:48AM (#50286579)
Is HN an advertizing site now?
Re:Gemini 4 Carbon on Wednesday October 28, 2026 @01:53PM (#50277948)
My general impression of all Google models I've tried so far is a general "goody two shoes" feeling which I find very, very frustrating.

I'm going to experiment with this one (assuming they ever get around to actually releasing it), and I'm really hoping the lame cultural aftertaste is gone.

Re:Gemini 4 Carbon on Wednesday October 28, 2026 @01:49PM (#50277864)
> some people are 100% Gemini, some are 100% Claude, some are using both.

Does that mean Anthropic now has a copy of Google's source code?

[EDIT]: thanks to people in the know for their answers.

Follow-up question:

if Anthropic models run in a Google cage, does that not also mean Google can distill Anthropic models even easier (both fast and unseen)?

Re:Gemini 4 Carbon on Wednesday October 28, 2026 @01:47PM (#50277807)
> When you are a megacorp, perhaps here even the megacorp, every mistake you make is worth millions to someone, the government, the media, individuals, or all of them

I don't buy it.

SpaceX is not exactly a small corporation, and they nevertheless strike me as far less risk-averse than GOOG and they deal with actual hardware that actually effing explodes.

Re:Gemini 4 Carbon on Wednesday October 28, 2026 @01:42PM (#50277697)
> it’s pleasant

for whom?

Re:Gemini 4 Carbon on Wednesday October 28, 2026 @01:41PM (#50277682)
Great to see Google reclaim the frontier, however, as usual with most Google launches, an announcement for a product that no one can actually try outside of a tiny circle of users.
> Microsoft and Others Tell Crypto Platform Not to Tokenize Their Stocks

Do they actually have a legal say in the matter?

Re:GPT-6.1 Terra on Monday October 26, 2026 @04:16PM (#50250281)
> If you have suggestions on how to name our products better, I'm all ears.

Hire an actual marketing person instead of letting engineers / ML researchers do things they're clearly terrible at ?

Re:Kimi K3.1 Pro and K3.1 Pro Highspeed on Friday October 23, 2026 @04:35PM (#50214964)
> How many frontier labs are there right now?

As long as LLM's can be distilled, and all these "labs" (what a weird name) can distill one another, there are going to be as many as capital is available to be burnt on the topic.

Re:It's still OK to enjoy programming on Monday October 19, 2026 @02:23PM (#50155976)
> It's still ok to enjoy programming

It is indeed, and full disclosure, I am 100% one of these folks.

Much like there are people that still forge full-scale two-handed swords in their garage.

Magnificent and fulfilling work, but with questionable economic value.

This document strikes me as quite dated.
Worth a read about Nathan Fielder, brings a bit of context.

https://archive.ph/sDeDD

> Having political strings attached is antithetical to the movement.

I believe you may have a rather narrow notion of what politics are.

In my book, politics is the art of making choices when your ability to predict the future is limited, and therefore the willingness, courage and fortitude to make choices under uncertainty.

Under that definition, they're making a choice, one that materially and obviously can't be backed by sound reasoning or logic (because predicting the future is hard), that's politics.

> I'd rather have the project that works,

You didn't get my point. It might very well be that the only project that lets you actually freely boot a computer in 5 years will be this one, specifically because they did not let an AI touch it.

In that regard, it will be the only project, like you put it, "that works".

Like I said, I don't necessary subscribe to their view, but the diversity of opinion matters, it helps with minor things like, oh, survival.

> Cool, that's why open source projects get left behind. The attitude

They're making a political choice. It's a free country, and more power to them.

It's not a choice that I necessarily agree with, but one that may - who knows - prove prescient 5 years down the road.

No one can predict the future, that's what politics are partly about and the reason why diversity of opinion of choice matters.

Do you have a crystal ball?

Re:Redesigning Source Control at Anthropic on Wednesday October 14, 2026 @12:53PM (#50090810)
> it seems that this repo will be in a constant state of continuous change and we constantly roll forward with automated code and obviously no direct human supervision

The whole thing, including ingestion and review, is not meant to be used by humans.

This is the shared memory / history of a horde of coding agents.

Re:Gemini 4 Argon on Wednesday October 14, 2026 @12:51PM (#50090765)
> How on earth do they keep an engineering org on the 'right track'?

They don't.

If they did, neither OpenAI nor Anthropic would even exist, as the core of what they're all doing was invented by Google engineers and researchers.

Re:Gemini 4 Argon on Wednesday October 14, 2026 @12:48PM (#50090729)
> The Google Gemini subscription landscape is such a mess...

The others are quite bad as well in that regard, but on this particular metric, Google has always been top dog. Goes back to way before AI ever took off, BTW.

> Nope

Really well argued, congrats.

> I would consider Safari, if Apple open sourced it and it ran on Linux.

Yes, absolutely. But then they wouldn't be able to lock the flock in the barn, which is so contrary to Apple's DNA that you can't event talk about it in a 1 mile radius of 1, Infinite loop.

> I don't think people realize that you can go back to a website after you've visited.

This is about as wrong as you can possibly get.

This would be true in a stateless world (assuming you can remember the site you want to visit).

Which the web hasn't been since a very long time.

iOS is a de-facto monopoly in the first place.

Older »