Re:Android 17 is the first since 3.x to add new APIs without...
by teekert on Saturday September 19, 2026 @01:45AM
(#49763678)
I did
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Android 17 is the first since 3.x to add new APIs without...
by cecexacjrgec on Saturday September 19, 2026 @04:02AM
(#49764407)
> a few AOSP enthusiasts dropping off
> I did
Precisely my point.
Re:Android 17 is the first since 3.x to add new APIs without...
by LoganDark on Saturday September 19, 2026 @06:39AM
(#49765291)
This is literally gaslighting; using someone's opinion as proof that nobody else holds it.
Re:Android 17 is the first since 3.x to add new APIs without...
by izacus on Saturday September 19, 2026 @07:06AM
(#49765485)
No, this isn't what gaslighting is or means.
Re:Android 17 is the first since 3.x to add new APIs without...
by LoganDark on Saturday September 19, 2026 @07:11AM
(#49765515)
Saying that holding a particular opinion makes you irrelevant is not gaslighting? It's not nice to respond to a frustrated developer by saying they don't exist. It feels comparable to saying someone's concerns are not real, which does amount to gaslighting to me.
Re:Android 17 is the first since 3.x to add new APIs without...
by fluidcruft on Saturday September 19, 2026 @09:41AM
(#49766540)
Gaslighting is making a person question the validity of their own true memories.
Re:Android 17 is the first since 3.x to add new APIs without...
by NetMageSCW on Saturday September 19, 2026 @02:40PM
(#49769091)
No one says graphene os doesn’t exist, or the developers don’t exist, just that their opinions don’t matter because they are a miniscule fraction of the market. 2% of active devices drives no decisions at Google.
Re:Android 17 is the first since 3.x to add new APIs without...
by exjejfjeifj on Saturday September 19, 2026 @12:24PM
(#49767840)
It quite literally isn’t.