Re:AI migrated legacy COBOL programs to Java, bugs included
by free_bip on Monday August 03, 2026 @10:08AM
(#49156000)
If what you want is the "Why", you're right it probably won't get it right. It'll just give you baseless speculation. But if what you want is the "What" or the "How", I think it can be useful.
Re:AI migrated legacy COBOL programs to Java, bugs included
by sharts on Monday August 03, 2026 @08:01PM
(#49162904)
The code is the information. If you need binders of info then it wasn’t codified
Re:AI migrated legacy COBOL programs to Java, bugs included
by pixel_popping on Thursday August 06, 2026 @09:42AM
(#49196579)
Yes, it would take a long time for humans to remake a documentation from the codebase itself, but AI could do that much quicker and with close to perfect accuracy, Code is superior to documentation as it's the direct intended behavior (including bugs), in a sense, we won't even need documentation in the future, except maybe to lower AI costs.
More like it will hallucinate some explanation & cause even more confusion.