Re:SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites – fo...
by db48x on Saturday July 11, 2026 @02:42AM
(#48869419)
Often the bigger difference is just that fiber never goes in a straight line, even if it’s going to the right city. All that pesky geography gets in the way and makes the path longer.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites – fo...
by dizhn on Saturday July 11, 2026 @09:32AM
(#48871929)
As far as I can tell it almost exclusively follows the existing roads in Europe. Probably an easier way to secure rights in one go like rails used to be for telco lines.
Re:SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites – fo...
by inemesitaffia on Saturday July 11, 2026 @10:41AM
(#48872469)
Pipelines, Sewer systems, rail too.
Re:SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites – fo...
by db48x on Saturday July 11, 2026 @07:11PM
(#48876724)
Geography and property lines, twin banes of every infrastructure builder.
Re:SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites – fo...
by bigfatkitten on Monday July 13, 2026 @06:32AM
(#48890559)
And because getting heavy plant up through a mountain range to dig trenches etc is a pain in the arse. It’s easier to do it along a main road.
Re:SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites – fo...
by db48x on Monday July 13, 2026 @04:21PM
(#48898254)
If you were smart about it then you wouldn’t go up in the mountains in the first place. To get the lowest possible latency you want a straight shot, so obviously you should just bore your way through at the level of the plains on either side.