MCP Is Dead - Hackdot

Re:MCP Is Dead by zvoque on Friday May 29, 2026 @07:09PM (#48330549)

I've thought that skills and small scripts > MCP for quite a while now, tried out MCP in the early days (official ones, ones i made for scripts i already had), but they always end up using more tool calls/tokens than if i had just written a script + skill for claude.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MCP Is Dead by eikenberry on Friday May 29, 2026 @07:12PM (#48330586)

MCP seems like what you'd do when you want to encapsulate and share a skill+script in a standard way.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MCP Is Dead by zvoque on Friday May 29, 2026 @07:33PM (#48330741)

personally if i have the need to move a skill/script, etc. to another one of my machines, i'll make a git repo for them (if they aren't already on git)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MCP Is Dead by speff on Friday May 29, 2026 @08:05PM (#48330950)

This was one of the first ideas me and my team had for sharing skills and scripts. The problem is this is a very "why Dropbox and not FTP" answer.

The second you utter the word git, you may have lost 90% of your audience - depending on their background, of course. MCPs are a lot more non-tech friendly

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MCP Is Dead by zvoque on Friday May 29, 2026 @08:21PM (#48331041)

yeah it 100% depends on who you'll be sharing them with, for me its just myself and a couple agents i have on a dedicated machine so git is ideal to keep versions matching when i update something on my daily driver

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MCP Is Dead by TurdF3rguson on Friday May 29, 2026 @10:22PM (#48331798)

Really? 90% of your claude code using team gets lost over git? That seems like it's own problem.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MCP Is Dead by noodletheworld on Friday May 29, 2026 @07:16PM (#48330622)

You can share a skill by copy pasting the text file to someone in slack.

Its not that hard.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MCP Is Dead by notatoad on Friday May 29, 2026 @10:39PM (#48331911)

right, but if you have 300 employees using ai and you want to share a skill with all of them, and you want to be able to push an update to the skill, mcp provides you with a standard way to do that.

i dont understand why people are so invested in making this a winner-take-all battle. skills are ligthweight and ad-hoc, MCP is managed and centralized. there's a place for both of those things, even if your personal workflow only needs skills.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MCP Is Dead by noodletheworld on Saturday May 30, 2026 @01:27AM (#48332905)

This is a daft argument.

We have b2b enterprise solutions for sharing text files; we have 1st party, security approved methods for distributing source code that are fundamentally business friendly and compatible with using skills.

MCP might have a place, but claiming it exists because you need a more “enterprise” solution to distributing prompts is just enormously difficult to justify.

(Unless, as the other peer comment indicates, you're not actually trying to make things better or useful, you're trying to sell access to your MCP server. I admit, I take it back; if shilling your company is all you care about maybe MCP is a better option)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MCP Is Dead by PhilipRoman on Saturday May 30, 2026 @04:07AM (#48333854)

Don't most companies have a Git repo for skills that you can pull?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MCP Is Dead by notatoad on Saturday May 30, 2026 @12:10PM (#48337778)

for developers working in claude code, sure. but there's ai users who don't use claude code. chatGPT business and enterprise tiers integrate with MCP servers controlled by your organization admin.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MCP Is Dead by monkpit on Friday May 29, 2026 @11:51PM (#48332370)

You can’t sell that in b2b negotiations though. You can absolutely say “and for $x per user we will grant you access to our central, closed-source MCP server that does things our CLI doesn’t do”.

[ Parent | on HN ]