Re:I think Anthropic and OpenAI have found product-market fit
by theschmed on Wednesday May 27, 2026 @07:29PM
(#48302200)
Yeah but the product is not “LLM” it’s “proprietary frontier model LLM paid by the token”.
And I don’t even necessarily disagree with OP! It’s more like the competition is shifting so quickly that your competitors could undercut your PMF in a blink of an eye.
Re:I think Anthropic and OpenAI have found product-market fit
by timmg on Wednesday May 27, 2026 @07:51PM
(#48302385)
There will be cheaper solutions. And they will generally be less capable than the more expensive ones. Just like most other products.
But my guess is that the cost of SWEs themselves mean that the more expensive ones will be worth the delta to most companies.
But time will tell.
Re:I think Anthropic and OpenAI have found product-market fit
by darkerside on Thursday May 28, 2026 @08:05AM
(#48307758)
History bears out that cheap and satisficing soundly beats expensive and optimal every time. Until we have smarter and more prescient decision makers in leadership, the bottleneck on output will be the quality of decision making not the quality of code. Trying more things faster and cheaper will win.
Re:I think Anthropic and OpenAI have found product-market fit
by oblio on Thursday May 28, 2026 @08:15AM
(#48307848)
Aka the cheap plastic solution always wins.
Re:I think Anthropic and OpenAI have found product-market fit
by airstrike on Wednesday May 27, 2026 @07:38PM
(#48302280)
True but that is maybe 5% of what is being promised by the average booster
Re:I think Anthropic and OpenAI have found product-market fit
by signatoremo on Wednesday May 27, 2026 @08:14PM
(#48302550)
Give examples of boosters (average or not) and what they've promised?
I'm not sure if this runs counter to your point or not, but: I don't see any future where LLMs aren't a core part of Software Engineering. The horse is out of the barn. There is no going back.