If you aren't telling your computer to ignore goblins, you're going to be left behind.

I'm goblinmaxxing myself.

Is GPT5.5 goblingooning fr?

We’re definitely not escaping the permanent goblin underclass with this one.

permanent goblin underclass

I wonder how much energy OpenAI spends each day on pink elephant paradoxing goblins. A prompt like that will preoccupy the LLM with goblins on every request.

That is a great point. Machine consumes energy of adding goblins in every response. The machine consumes energy on removing goblins from every response. That is a great attack vector. If (wild imagination ensues) an adversary can do that x100 (goblins, potatoes, dragons, Lightning McQueen, etc.) they can render the machine useless/uneconomical from the standpoint of energy consumption.

In Terminator 7, everyone will carry goblin plush toys to defend themselves against the machines.

I mean probably not or they wouldn’t have shipped it, right?

Greater context size means more computational resources means more energy. Dedicating a portion of the context to telling the LLM not to refer to goblins then has a non-zero energy cost every time you prompt the model.

Prompt engineering is mostly structured thought. Can you write a lab report? Can you describe the who, what, when, where, and why of a problem and its solution?

You can get it to work with one off commands or specific instructions, but I think that will be seen as hacks, red flags, prompt smells in the long term.

If I could do those things, I wouldn't be using an LLM to write for me, now would I?

You don’t let the LLM write prise for you, you get it to translate natural language into code somewhat coherently.

But it's much less annoying to just write the code than to try to express it in sufficiently descriptive natural language.

skill issue

Converse for me so ymmv.

In this instance I'm assuming most of the "goblin" references were in prose rather than in source code, so the goal of this particular prompt edit was directed toward making the prose better.