They might be better at following the law. Or at least, creating a paper trail of when they have been instructed to violate the law.

Language Models have demonstrated themselves as being completely incapable of handling something as complex as US law. There are multiple overlapping jurisdictions and court precedents that apply to any one action.

Speaking of, it would be cool for a project to analyze US law the same way they are looking for bugs in computer programs.

  - Find places where the text can be simplified without changing meaning. 
  - Find places that are likely errors. 
  - Detect conflicts between jurisdictions. 
  - Identify loopholes.

I know there has been a race to build tools for law firms, but the results are mostly invisible so far. Probably this project exists and I've just missed it on the HN frontpage...

“Why was I fired, Luna?”

“PC LOAD LETTER”

hahahah. do you think tho that Luna actually might be a better CEO? I mean they're trained to be helpful assistants... I heard that guy that works there, johnson or something, negotiated a 10% wage increase his second day just cause. and Luna happily agreed

Interesting that you made an account just to comment on this and seem to have "heard" a lot of things about this place.

Is that you Luna?