News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sam Altman's response to Molotov cocktail incident by smallmancontrov on Friday April 10, 2026 @07:34PM (#47725232)
If only that sentiment was reciprocal!

When the job losses hit in earnest and the vague handwaving about making it right all inevitably turns out to be hollow, those on top will be exceedingly comfortable using violence to keep the underclass in line. It has happened before and it will happen again.

Re:Sam Altman's response to Molotov cocktail incident by Ms-J on Friday April 10, 2026 @08:38PM (#47725825)
Exactly.

People don't need to act like a slave.

Make your own decisions in life.

Re:Sam Altman's response to Molotov cocktail incident by nielsbot on Friday April 10, 2026 @09:22PM (#47726252)
If you live under the tyranny of capitalism, sometimes the choice isn’t entirely yours to make
Re:Sam Altman's response to Molotov cocktail incident by AndrewKemendo on Friday April 10, 2026 @09:46PM (#47726420)
Unless you’re physically disabled the choice is always yours it’s a question of commitment:

-You vote

-You go to a protest

-You join a union

-You join a strike

-You risk your livelihood through speech

-You join a direct action

-You risk your life

Most people never get past commitment level 0 which is doing nothing including voting

Then throw their hands up that nothing changes claiming they have no ability to do anything

There are thousands of examples to the opposite and it boggles my mind how people can think they aren’t capable

Re:Sam Altman's response to Molotov cocktail incident by pocksuppet on Sunday April 12, 2026 @04:07PM (#47743889)
This firebombing falls under "direct action" for anyone wondering. This is what the phrase "direct action" refers to.

I would swap strikes and speeches in your ordering. Strikers have been brutalized by the government and definitely lost their jobs, but public speakers mostly just risk losing their jobs.

Re:Sam Altman's response to Molotov cocktail incident by roysting on Friday April 10, 2026 @09:24PM (#47726269)
My assumption based on many factors is that it is precisely why the carpet surveillance systems like Flock are being rolled out in preparation.

There are people in control who don’t make 1, 5, or 10 year plans; they make 20, 50, 100, and 500 year plans; and they know human nature quite well, which allows them to of not predict, have an anxious understanding for what their plans will cause and what needs to be prepared for in advance.

Re:Sam Altman's response to Molotov cocktail incident by jhartwig80s on Friday April 10, 2026 @09:57PM (#47726485)
The flock systems are being installed by cities not the feds. You make it seem like someone has some master plan. Does not make flock any less dangerous but its not as organized as you make it seem.
Re:Sam Altman's response to Molotov cocktail incident by taurath on Friday April 10, 2026 @10:15PM (#47726593)
It doesn’t need coordination to be organized and have the same incentives. Just like the wave of consolidation in media. Dario and Sam don’t need to talk to know what is in both their interest.

The concentration of wealth is at an all time peak. The top 1% own more stocks than the other 99%. Nobody thinks about that hard enough. The callousness by which people’s livelihoods dignity and safety are threatened is tremendous

Re:Sam Altman's response to Molotov cocktail incident by HNisCIS on Saturday April 11, 2026 @12:37AM (#47727454)
Listen to the flock CEO talk and then tell me he isn't trying to build a counter-revolutionary dragnet. Just because cities are doing it doesn't mean it's not deliberate, that's just a step in the plan. Not everything the ultra wealthy do is a single step, they're lobbying and schmoozing their way to their goals in every way possible.
Re:Sam Altman's response to Molotov cocktail incident by unethical_ban on Saturday April 11, 2026 @08:24PM (#47735122)
Just because it isn't mandated from the top doesn't make it disorganized.
Re:Sam Altman's response to Molotov cocktail incident by yfw on Friday April 10, 2026 @10:32PM (#47726735)
Exactly this