From me. OD is a great dev firm. Do you understand my statement?

Do you understand that you can't redirect the question addressed to you to the devs if that question questions your own statement by pointing out that some important details are not attended to?

>OD is a great dev firm

Please see my response to OD [I presume /u/littlesnitch is OD representative]. Nobody is disputing their "greatness" — I'm just criticizing a flaw in their approach to domain name filtering.

Hopefully OD will refund my original license (unused for many many many years, after I discovered this flaw). That would be good, in principle; good business. Hopefully OD will be more forthcoming in this vulnerability (or better disclose it) — or better yet: fix the unbelievable behavior.

Are you blaming me for promoting software that I didn't write?

No, I'm pointing out (against your initial claim) that OD's attention to detail might be lacking, here... at least they ought'a disclose the described/known vulnerability.

Instead, /u/LittleSnitch just commented elsewhere "Little Snitch is not a security tool" — interpret accordingly.

Ok, so what was this?

> Did the "attention to detail" phrase come from devs or you?

It sure sounds like you're accusing me of something like being a schill.

Chill, dawg.

That comment wasn't mine.