Muse Spark: Scaling Towards Personal Superintelligence

Re:Muse Spark: Scaling Towards Personal Superintelligence by Artgor on Wednesday April 08, 2026 @12:29PM (#47692467)

I'm cautiously waiting for the feedback from the first users. Meta has produced a lot of great models (LLama), maybe this is a comeback... but I'm cautious, as the jump in the quality is almost too high.

Also, I think people aren't used that using such models requires meta.ai or meta ai app.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Muse Spark: Scaling Towards Personal Superintelligence by solenoid0937 on Wednesday April 08, 2026 @12:37PM (#47692596)

My Meta friends say it's benchmaxxed af

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Muse Spark: Scaling Towards Personal Superintelligence by loeg on Wednesday April 08, 2026 @01:09PM (#47693119)

We used to call this "overfitting," but I suppose everything has to be maxxed now. Fitmaxxed?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Muse Spark: Scaling Towards Personal Superintelligence by conradkay on Wednesday April 08, 2026 @12:40PM (#47692643)

It doesn't seem benchmaxxed, ARC AGI 2 score is quite bad (42.5%, GPT 5.4 is 76.1%) and coding is okay. But maybe this is the best Meta can do even benchmaxxing

The impressive part is multimodality, very plausible since there's less focus there by other labs (especially Anthropic)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Muse Spark: Scaling Towards Personal Superintelligence by dbgrman on Wednesday April 08, 2026 @04:23PM (#47695788)

Given llama 4 mucked up benchmark numbers, I’d take spark announcement with a many grains of salt.

[ Parent | on HN ]