Oh sure. I don't want to say everybody are driven by ideals and not greed, but that even people with strong ideals and good intentions can do a lot of bad by being blinded by those same ideals.

Yes, though Meta is a bad example as they started off with the values of Zuckerberg, and still have them.

Exactly right. But i think it makes it a good example actually. Company DNA is a thing. Bill Gates isn't running microsoft anymore. Still...

What would be more appropriate example?

Apple, Tesla, Oculus.

The first two are definitely "heroes who lived long enough to be villains"; Oculus is more of an "I recon" due to how it was seen right up until getting bought by Facebook.

Adobe?

LOL, Palmer Luckey is a right-wing war mongering psychopath.

But in the stock market, it is almost impossible for companies like Anthropic or any successful startups not to become villains (profit first no matter what). Anthropic especially needs to burn huge amount of money, so they need a lot of funding. The only way to keep founders' idealism is probably to copy Zuckerberg. Divide stocks with and without voting-power and trade only no-voting stocks.

I'm not denying 95% of that, only saying that Zuckerberg didn't have any idealism to lose in the first place.

I actually forgot that his first site was facemash which single purpose was to rate "hotness" of each individual girl on his University.

Anthropic is not a public company.

All of Meta's VR stuff should rationally be cut loose and refunded if it were all about greed. That stuff only survives because Zuck is a nerd who wants it to happen (but it's not going to.)

Well, they were just totally doing it the wrong way - with the result being ugly corporate distopia. They could haver just looked at what paople are using VR for & improved it to succeed.

VRChat is thriving and some other similar envronments being quite popular as well.

Just give people something that they actually want and make it nice and people will like it - huge surprise!