News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:'Peanut butter' pay raises could cost companies their top... by moomin on Sunday February 22, 2026 @03:36PM (#47114393)
My prediction is that this strategy will work out better for the companies than the article expects. Why? Because firms are actually often absolutely lousy at recognising which of their employees are high performers in the first place.
Re:'Peanut butter' pay raises could cost companies their top... by 3eb7988a1663 on Sunday February 22, 2026 @04:56PM (#47115160)
It is a tough job market. Minus the very top echelon of talent, switching jobs today is a lot more challenging than in the past. Management knows this and can shave a few pennies off the books by capitalizing on this moment.
Re:'Peanut butter' pay raises could cost companies their top... by bdangubic on Sunday February 22, 2026 @05:01PM (#47115209)
it is management that is successfully convincing people that it is a tough job market - it is not - it is same as before. I am a contractor, have more work offered than I can take (same as before, maybe even slightly more). four friends/former colleagues got new jobs since the beginning of December, each had multiple offers and got decent to significant pay increases compared to previous positions.
Re:'Peanut butter' pay raises could cost companies their top... by rythmshifter on Sunday February 22, 2026 @05:51PM (#47115656)
14 months can’t find IT ops remote work
Re:'Peanut butter' pay raises could cost companies their top... by mrgoldenbrown on Sunday February 22, 2026 @08:47PM (#47117041)
I think remote work peaked and is slowly declining now, for better or worse.
Re:'Peanut butter' pay raises could cost companies their top... by bdangubic on Monday February 23, 2026 @09:06AM (#47122509)
remote work is pretty much done, if you are looking for 100% remote work you'll have a very hard time finding it unless you get a job through a referral of a former colleague or something like that
Re:'Peanut butter' pay raises could cost companies their top... by lovich on Sunday February 22, 2026 @06:49PM (#47116130)
If we’re doing anecdata I haven’t been able to get w-2 work in over a year and have been taking sporadic contract work.

I’m several hundred applications in and have hired a recruitment firm to help me find positions. Multiple companies where I referred by friends of mine declined to even phone screen and then those respective friends reported that the position was closed and they were given zero info as to what was happening.

Re:'Peanut butter' pay raises could cost companies their top... by catsquirrel28 on Sunday February 22, 2026 @05:58PM (#47115730)
Maybe that's because most jobs are Graberesque bullshit jobs where "high performance" is meaningless.

Most jobs shouldn't exist at all. The value captured by "firms" should instead be captured by the state and distributed peanut butter style to everyone.

Re:'Peanut butter' pay raises could cost companies their top... by craftwerk on Sunday February 22, 2026 @11:08PM (#47117992)
I also found his thesis compelling, but it’s built on bad social science: https://open.substack.com/pub/gilpignol/p/bullshit-jobs-was-...
Re:'Peanut butter' pay raises could cost companies their top... by pc86 on Monday February 23, 2026 @12:37PM (#47125637)
How exactly should the state "capture" value generated by these firms? Would it pay the employees more? What would the competitive advantage be? If the jobs are bullshit, why wouldn't some other firm capture the same value without those jobs, making even more profit with less overhead?
Re:'Peanut butter' pay raises could cost companies their top... by cyanydeez on Sunday February 22, 2026 @08:22PM (#47116862)
The risk-reward of over paying employees who are risk adverse is why this works for most employers.
Re:'Peanut butter' pay raises could cost companies their top... by notnullorvoid on Monday February 23, 2026 @03:53AM (#47119772)
Yup, it's a bad feeling hearing that lower performers are getting payed more than you.