Re:Notepad++ supply chain attack breakdown
by FergusArgyll on Tuesday February 03, 2026 @07:02PM
(#46879324)
Doesn't it use bwrap under the hood? what's wrong with that?
Re:Notepad++ supply chain attack breakdown
by okanat on Tuesday February 03, 2026 @07:46PM
(#46879760)
Many apps require unnecessarily broad permissions with Flatpak. Unlike Android and iOS apps they weren't designed for environments with limited permissions.
Re:Notepad++ supply chain attack breakdown
by IsTom on Wednesday February 04, 2026 @07:00AM
(#46884814)
> Unlike Android
My experience with android apps seems to be different. Every other app seems to be asking for contacts or calling or access to files.
Re:Notepad++ supply chain attack breakdown
by HPsquared on Wednesday February 04, 2026 @07:42AM
(#46885155)
You can usually deny those. If they ask for them without a good reason, that's already suspicious.
Re:Notepad++ supply chain attack breakdown
by jacobgkau on Tuesday February 03, 2026 @06:44PM
(#46879127)
The XDG portal standards being developed to provide permissions to apps (and allow users to manage them), including those installed via Flatpak, will continue to be useful if and when the sandboxing security of Flatpaks are improved. (In fact, having the frontend management part in place is kind of a prerequisite to really enforcing a lot of restrictions on apps, lest they just stop working suddenly.)
Re:Notepad++ supply chain attack breakdown
by vondur on Tuesday February 03, 2026 @09:24PM
(#46880652)
I assumed the primary feature of Flatpak was to make a “universal” package across all Linux platforms. The security side of things seems to be a secondary consideration. I assume that the security aspect is now a much higher priority.
Not sure how something can be called a sandbox without the actual box part. As Siri is to AI, Flatpak is to sandboxes.