I get that it's distasteful, I just really don't care. It's not a big deal. Why do you care? If they post doctored photos for a giggle to slightly humiliate criminals or degenerates, why is that such a scandal in your eyes?
Sackable offence in many countries.
Principally those countries with a regard for law, order, fairness, transparency, justice, etc.
The question really is, why would this be acceptable in the USofA by any administration.
Tens of thousands of people are protesting and some getting arrested, anyone with a voice is doing what they can to sway public opinion.
Our higher courts are compromised (and feckless at times even when used correctly), and the police help ICE. And a large number of Americans do, in fact, want this. Others don’t care until it hits them personally.
So what specifically are people to do, like myself, who live in an unaffected area and who’s politicians are in fact speaking out against this?
Vote better for a start. The amount of support this administration has is still way too high considering everything they've done and are doing. It's shaken my faith in humanity a bit to see how many of the people around me don't seem to actually value humanity.
The current discussion is about Minnesota, where this is very much not the case.
https://thefederalnewswire.com/stories/673148305-fbi-announc...
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/23/us/fbi-agent-ice-shooting...
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
It's surely reasonable to assume they meant something that is factually accurate. Using "the police" to refer to law enforcement in general is common; additionally, the alleged crimes are in the purview of the FBI. There is ample context to interpret their words more strongly.
With all the deepest respect toward the US citizens I know, have talked to, and those that don't support the current administration ...
Theres's now _zero_ respect for the US.
Yours sincerely, long time five eyes allies.
IMO Trump has exposed fatal flaw in democracy that everyone kinda knew about but nobody wanted to admit because it's never been exploited in a well-established, highly-functioning, independent democracy before - turns out, majority of voters are dumb fucks. Once you accept this as truth, lots of pieces fall into place.
Assuming that most people DO support Trump and his politics, in a democratic system the judges have no basis to be the adults in the room and actually tell voters what they're allowed to do and what they aren't.
In fairness, many people have been working hard for decades to turn as many people into illiterate dumb fucks as possible. We didn't get here accidentally.
They eventually (more or less) gave up, finding all their efforts at comfortable explanations unsupportable. Nope, it’s just luck, momentum, and the difficult of intentionally directing large chaotic systems keeping things tolerably sane. It’s, in fact, very scary and it’s astounding it works at all.
It no longer does. Social media was the tipping point.
Religion wasn't enough to break democracy, newspapers weren't enough, radio wasn't enough, TV was almost enough... but now, with social media as the proverbial last straw, the bug is fully exploited, completely unfixable, and likely fatal.
The medium is the message, and I think the “message” of the global Web + social media + (now) generative AI may not include liberal democracy.
What law do you suppose it violates?
This is exactly who we are now. We are all complicit. Anger is a valid response.
Also, can someone explain to me why NOTHING of this is challenged in court or prosecuted? Where the hell is your judicial system?