News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Earth is warming faster. Scientists are closing in on why by PunchyHamster on Saturday January 17, 2026 @02:08PM (#46660966)
Interacting with complex systems produces complex side-effects.

And ecosystem is complex enough that we can't really predict those side-effects before they happen and they can make other things worse.

Just spraying random stuff that happens to work on paper is equivalent in subtlety to electroshocking patient to fix their mental issues.

That is not to say it is not possible, but on top of being expensive it would require a lot of care to not make stuff get worse in other ways.

Re:Earth is warming faster. Scientists are closing in on why by whimsicalism on Saturday January 17, 2026 @02:14PM (#46661040)
Right, but the point is that we've already had the test with so2, so it's not really "before they happen".
Re:Earth is warming faster. Scientists are closing in on why by estearum on Saturday January 17, 2026 @02:15PM (#46661057)
We literally have not. We have tested low-altitude, low-saturation, continuous maritime dispersal.

You can go look up the differences in dissipation dynamics between that and what’s being proposed by the BS in Econ student and his growth marketing cofounder.

Re:Earth is warming faster. Scientists are closing in on why by whimsicalism on Saturday January 17, 2026 @02:20PM (#46661112)
I don't now who the BS in econ student you're referring to is, as it's not the context of the article. We have had massive SO2 emissions from past stratovolcano eruptions.

Sure - there is definitely some gap between these natural processes and the artificial processes being proposed, but it is a narrow enough gap that it does preclude a fair number of second-order effects, compared to almost all geoengineering ideas that do not have such natural experiment equivalents.

Re:Earth is warming faster. Scientists are closing in on why by IsTom on Saturday January 17, 2026 @03:06PM (#46661531)
Acid rain isn't great either
Re:Earth is warming faster. Scientists are closing in on why by card_zero on Saturday January 17, 2026 @02:19PM (#46661108)
Well electroconvulsive therapy works quite well and is still in use as a stopgap at times of urgent need. So this analogy argues the wrong way.