card_zero

Exercising them to make them release a factor, which must mean some specific protein. Maybe that could be obtained elsewhere, and eaten.

Will that clarify this matter? "Further experiments by Bai’s team suggested the DTAL treatment triggers osteocytes to secrete blood-borne antiaging factors." I don't think they know what the factors are.

You've inspired me, I'm gonna get a lot of massages and eat more pork stock.

Oh, top tip. I didn't even try the about page.

Mining.

Hmm, that does compensate somewhat.

"We learned some ways to bypass the dumbness" "They are still dumb"

Same problem as last time somebody made one of these: what I want to see is not most recommended, but least recommended, like books mentioned exactly twice. But there's no button to sort that way. So I'm flailing around at the top of your infinite scroll trying hopelessly to reach the bottom.

I was just reading about some environmental protestors outside the first minister's residence in Edinburgh. They're doing a Halloween protest with lots of pumpkins, it seems quite nice.

Seems correct though? "Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics". I guess medicine is a science. Political science might be engineering.

GDP is linked to stability, an economist can't alter that, it just takes time post-revolution. Having the army run the country would improve security and stability and GDP, but then you've got the army running the country, which perhaps hasn't been going so well for another nearby country, the one that probably causes the security anxieties I imagine.

The other LLM is obviously transformative because it's a different LLM and therefore is not even the same kind of thing, like how a white horse is not a horse, obviously.

Yes, any fungi. Brewer's yeast, for instance.

The presence of all the Shakespeare references is quite coincidental, if Patrick Stewart didn't influence the writing at all.

Using a computer to do "by hand" is a vague concept, yes, but laws routinely embrace vague concepts. You used it yourself! "Hand-crafting", you said. It could be pinned down more closely to something like a single action that happens quite soon after you press a button or ... and further wrangling could ensue because it's never going to have all the vagueness removed. It's probably relative to current norms of computer use and what we do or don't automate casually (and thus describe as "by hand").

There are also many other irrelevant parameters. A thing isn't beautiful because it's pressurized, biodegradable, scheduled, dusty, reversed, volatile, modular, or rubber. However, beautiful things should last, because that would be better.

Wait, was that a Picard quote, in fact? It has the right tone. (Nope, looks like it's from Age of Ultron.)

Well now I just want The Picard Song ... ah, here it is. https://archive.org/details/darkmateria_picard

Walter Koenig (Pavel Chekov) died too, a few days ago.

So, I'll pick up on the weak points:

> As long as we have questions to ask, they are not theoretically constrained

> some infinities are bigger than others

Those are both limitations. They need conjectures and they need training data. Can they produce their own conjectures and training data, and feed off it forever, while staying meaningful and not being stuck in a loop (a very large set of repeating cliches) or descending into confused noise?

Yeah, I have some questions to add to their faq: https://centurylibrary.com/license-info/

* Will you actually sue anybody who doesn't follow your very fussy rules about what they can't do with the public domain works that you've scanned?

* Will you win if you try?

* Do you deliberately hide the original sources and names in case people go straight to the source instead of paying you?

* What happens to the rare books after you scan them?

Today I read this news story: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cv62yg0erp8zo

They are doing damnatio memoriae on a footballer (who plays for Real Madrid), canceling his branded products, no longer mentioning him in news stories, and saying he should stay out of China, because he indirectly implied that Mao was a dictator.

So, OK, that's a kind of social harmony: they're very unified in telling you what you mustn't even suggest.

It's parasitic on humans and it's not an infinitely deep well. Wrong?

But it was also stated that their labor is extracted, which sounds like slavery, and that they are exploited, which sounds like fraud, and that they take some psychic damage, which sounds like a JRPG. Those would all be bad things.

The not/note typo strikes again, it reverses the meaning of a phrase.

There's a tenuous Roman connection mentioned here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principality_of_Theodoro

"with several scholars identifying the "Dmitry", one of the three Golden Horde princes in the Battle of Blue Waters (c. 1362/1363), with a Prince of Gothia."

Certainly a good source of linked data. I was just using it to investigate why there's a fort called "Babylon" in Egypt, and then admiring the well-preserved brickwork. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babylon_Fortress

I still have a copy of Photoshop 7 burned on a CD. Photoshop was once really excellent, back before its glory was clouded by subscriptions.

"Matures", like fades into the background. That's kind of the null hypothesis.

I'm not making a serious prediction that it will go away! I'm making an anti-prediction against the reflexive assumption of a massive increase in importance, to say that for all any would-be oracle knows, we could get the opposite, just as easily as their fortune-telling.

Everybody is maliciously taking you seriously :D

Hang in there! It gets better!

So for instance like if AI becomes slowly less relevant, then is discarded all at once. Change will be surprising! That much is likely.