Re:The Next Two Years of Software Engineering
by kylecazar on Sunday January 11, 2026 @08:47PM
(#46582841)
Half strawman -- a mudman, perhaps. Because we're seeing proper experts with credentials jump on the 'shit, AI can do all of this for me' realization blog post train.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Next Two Years of Software Engineering
by eaurouge on Sunday January 11, 2026 @08:52PM
(#46582887)
So another strawman?
Re:The Next Two Years of Software Engineering
by Chris2048 on Monday January 12, 2026 @05:24AM
(#46586492)
Which experts?
Re:The Next Two Years of Software Engineering
by kylecazar on Monday January 12, 2026 @08:05AM
(#46587903)
Well, I have a lot of respect for antirez (Redis), and at the time of my writing this comment he had a front page blog post in which we find:
"Writing code is no longer needed for the most part."
It was a great post and I don't disagree with him. But it's an example of why it isn't necessarily a strawman anymore, because it is being claimed/realized by more than just vibecoders and hobbyists.
Does Linus Torvalds count?
Re:The Next Two Years of Software Engineering
by ruszki on Monday January 12, 2026 @06:33AM
(#46587045)
When has he stated that he uses AI like that? The last I heard about him a month ago, he specifically stated that he was not interested in AI to write code: https://www.zdnet.com/article/linus-torvalds-ai-tool-maintai...
Re:The Next Two Years of Software Engineering
by Philpax on Monday January 12, 2026 @06:48AM
(#46587157)
3 days ago: https://github.com/torvalds/AudioNoise/blob/main/README.md
> Also note that the python visualizer tool has been basically written by vibe-coding. I know more about analog filters -- and that's not saying much -- than I do about python. It started out as my typical "google and do the monkey-see-monkey-do" kind of programming, but then I cut out the middle-man -- me -- and just used Google Antigravity to do the audio sample visualizer.