News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Scientists edited genes in a living person and saved his ... by dlcarrier on Saturday December 27, 2025 @03:22PM (#46404905)
There was a guy on YouTube who genetically engineered himself to gain lactose tolerance. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3FcbFqSoQY)

It lasted for around a year and a half (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoczYXJeMY4) before the effect mostly wore off. He took it orally, so it only affected his intestinal lining, and I presume it didn't effect enough stem cells to get a permanent effect, but it would still be usable as something taken annually, which is still far less often than any medication.

Re:Scientists edited genes in a living person and saved his ... by pinkmuffinere on Saturday December 27, 2025 @04:26PM (#46405404)
Wow this is amazing. Definitely the best biology video I've seen.

Edit: this is cool enough to deserve it’s own post, Im going to submit it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46405855

Re:Scientists edited genes in a living person and saved his ... by amelius on Saturday December 27, 2025 @07:44PM (#46407174)
Agreed. If this isn't hacking then I don't know what is.
Re:Scientists edited genes in a living person and saved his ... by c1ccccc1 on Saturday December 27, 2025 @04:55PM (#46405684)
̶I̶ ̶t̶h̶i̶n̶k̶ ̶h̶e̶ ̶a̶c̶t̶u̶a̶l̶l̶y̶ ̶g̶e̶n̶e̶t̶i̶c̶a̶l̶l̶y̶ ̶e̶n̶g̶i̶n̶e̶e̶r̶e̶d̶ ̶h̶i̶s̶ ̶g̶u̶t̶ ̶b̶a̶c̶t̶e̶r̶i̶a̶ ̶r̶a̶t̶h̶e̶r̶ ̶t̶h̶a̶n̶ ̶a̶n̶y̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶h̶i̶s̶ ̶o̶w̶n̶ ̶c̶e̶l̶l̶s̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶r̶e̶,̶ ̶r̶i̶g̶h̶t̶?̶

EDIT: Above is false. Went back and checked and I had mis-remembered the video.

Re:Scientists edited genes in a living person and saved his ... by pinkmuffinere on Saturday December 27, 2025 @05:05PM (#46405768)
From the video, it sounds like he engineered his own cells. Using a virus that is known for transferring genetic material into other organisms, he added a gene for producing lactase, and then ate it. I suppose that would affect both his gut bacteria and his own cells. But it lasted for ~1.5 years, which probably indicates that it truly was his cells. Also he seems to know what he's talking about, and he claims it was his own cells.
Re:Scientists edited genes in a living person and saved his ... by c1ccccc1 on Saturday December 27, 2025 @06:04PM (#46406383)
You're right, thanks!
Re:Scientists edited genes in a living person and saved his ... by pfannkuchen on Sunday December 28, 2025 @03:37PM (#46414252)
Could be placebo though?
Re:Scientists edited genes in a living person and saved his ... by nebster on Saturday December 27, 2025 @06:46PM (#46406747)
Is there a reason why I'm seeing squares between each of the characters in your message? It's making it pretty hard to read...

I'm using Chrome on Android

Re:Scientists edited genes in a living person and saved his ... by p00dles on Saturday December 27, 2025 @07:03PM (#46406882)
Firefox on iOS, I see strikethrough but the strikes are at varying heights.
Re:Scientists edited genes in a living person and saved his ... by dlcarrier on Sunday December 28, 2025 @09:51PM (#46416963)
The text is crossed out using Unicode combining characters of a strikethrough. This allows it to display without any specific formatting support, but it does require that the font support those characters. The font you're using doesn't support the characters, so it displays boxes, instead.
Re:Scientists edited genes in a living person and saved his ... by thrance on Saturday December 27, 2025 @05:50PM (#46406224)
I thought (maybe mistakenly) that your body developed immunity to the adenovirus used to edit your own DNA, and so this trick could only be used once? Am I wrong?
Re:Scientists edited genes in a living person and saved his ... by fao_ on Saturday December 27, 2025 @07:06PM (#46406904)
In this specific instance the code he built used a non-human lactase-enzyme producing gene, which he states in the retrospective is very likely the reason why his immune cells started attacking. There was also the matter of some of the other coding pieces being non-ideal.