News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mozilla appoints new CEO Anthony Enzor-Demeo by Dylan16807 on Wednesday December 17, 2025 @11:48AM (#46301929)
"low effort" is a completely different statement from supporting monopolies. If that's what you actually meant, sure I guess.

But it's really hard for a normal person to do much about steering firefox other than helping raise a fuss.

Sometimes there isn't "a solution".

Re:Mozilla appoints new CEO Anthony Enzor-Demeo by smaudet on Thursday December 18, 2025 @12:02PM (#46315370)
There may not be "a solution", but recognizing FUD for what it is, is a part of the "whole" solution.

If you don't have something to contribute (like a direction, suggestion, correction), then as they used to say, you are "part of the problem".

Re:Mozilla appoints new CEO Anthony Enzor-Demeo by Dylan16807 on Thursday December 18, 2025 @01:42PM (#46316747)
Shaming organizations into changing course sometimes works.

And even if it's useless that doesn't make it FUD.

Re:Mozilla appoints new CEO Anthony Enzor-Demeo by smaudet on Friday December 19, 2025 @10:05AM (#46326631)
I think when there's overblown criticism (does not take into account the positive things, seeks only to paint in a negative light), that's pretty clearly FUD.

Moreover, when there's a pattern of it occurring, for at least the past 5 years...

Not saying that firefox is perfect, I have issues with its project leadership too, but its nowhere near as bad as the (most vocal) critics like to claim.