Re:Mozilla appoints new CEO Anthony Enzor-Demeo
by Dylan16807 on Wednesday December 17, 2025 @11:48AM
(#46301929)
"low effort" is a completely different statement from supporting monopolies. If that's what you actually meant, sure I guess.
But it's really hard for a normal person to do much about steering firefox other than helping raise a fuss.
Sometimes there isn't "a solution".
Re:Mozilla appoints new CEO Anthony Enzor-Demeo
by smaudet on Thursday December 18, 2025 @12:02PM
(#46315370)
There may not be "a solution", but recognizing FUD for what it is, is a part of the "whole" solution.
If you don't have something to contribute (like a direction, suggestion, correction), then as they used to say, you are "part of the problem".
Re:Mozilla appoints new CEO Anthony Enzor-Demeo
by Dylan16807 on Thursday December 18, 2025 @01:42PM
(#46316747)
Shaming organizations into changing course sometimes works.
And even if it's useless that doesn't make it FUD.
Re:Mozilla appoints new CEO Anthony Enzor-Demeo
by smaudet on Friday December 19, 2025 @10:05AM
(#46326631)
I think when there's overblown criticism (does not take into account the positive things, seeks only to paint in a negative light), that's pretty clearly FUD.
Moreover, when there's a pattern of it occurring, for at least the past 5 years...
Not saying that firefox is perfect, I have issues with its project leadership too, but its nowhere near as bad as the (most vocal) critics like to claim.
"This is a problem, and here is what I/we should do", takes a bit more effort.
Firefox is still open source last I checked. You can still contribute, write bugs, write letters to the CEO, etc...
I'm only taking issue with tendency people have to throw shade without offering a solution.