Re:Australia's social media ban for children takes effect in...
by killingtime74 on Wednesday December 10, 2025 @12:31PM
(#46220656)
Socialising != Social media. Teens can still use messenger, WhatsApp, phonecalls, text or even....face to face!
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Australia's social media ban for children takes effect in...
by baby on Wednesday December 10, 2025 @01:23PM
(#46221381)
That's true. I'll say this though: my social life skyrocketed thanks to Facebook when I was ~18. Not sure what kind of impact it would have had earlier, I was def. more of a kid and social medias were not a thing anyway. Makes sense to me to have an age limit considering cyber bullying and teen suicides and all.
Re:Australia's social media ban for children takes effect in...
by kahmeal on Wednesday December 10, 2025 @01:43PM
(#46221686)
Facebook then wasn't what facebook is today. The social media of the early internet was largely a digital expansion of otherwise healthy social norms. Then the internet blew up. Now it's more akin to the drug dealers DARE warned us about. Still waiting on _those_ free drugs, tbh.
Re:Australia's social media ban for children takes effect in...
by gffrd on Wednesday December 10, 2025 @04:08PM
(#46223884)
It’s possible your social life would have exploded without Facebook.
If you found a community on Facebook, you’d likely have found it regardless without it.
Re:Australia's social media ban for children takes effect in...
by rhines on Wednesday December 10, 2025 @02:39PM
(#46222557)
Social media is no longer social - it's just media. At least for most people anyway. The average user, and probably kids even more so, are just scrolling through.
If you're posting as well, or at least commenting on stuff and having discussions with people you know (even if you just know them online), I think that's fine. Like forums, or being in group chats with friends on Facebook, or sharing photos you take with a specific community.
It's when you're only consuming (like scrolling TikTok or Instagram), or when your comments are written for the algorithm rather than for actual discussion (like on Reddit, or even Hackernews to an extent), that social media is an issue.
Re:Australia's social media ban for children takes effect in...
by Tom1380 on Thursday December 11, 2025 @05:32AM
(#46229738)
What is meant by writing comments for the algorithm?
Re:Australia's social media ban for children takes effect in...
by rhines on Monday December 15, 2025 @09:42AM
(#46275156)
Or upvotes might be a better example, at least for Reddit/Hackernews. But the idea being that the comments are sorted based on some algorithm, whether than be popularity or something else, and commenters are trying to optimize for that. In traditional forums where comments are sorted linearly and it's more about having a discussion with others, but when comments are surfaced by other metrics then it's less about the discussion and more about gaming those metrics.
Re:Australia's social media ban for children takes effect in...
by jsphweid on Wednesday December 10, 2025 @01:46PM
(#46221739)
What year was it when you were 18? Facebook was enormous for me when I was 18, in 2008, for similar reasons. However, these days facebook is mostly just ads and generic modern feed garbage content in general.
Re:Australia's social media ban for children takes effect in...
by globular-toast on Thursday December 11, 2025 @01:28AM
(#46228295)
Yeah because all your peers were on it. It wouldn't have skyrocketed if they weren't.