Conflating the "establishment" into a false monolith is rhetorically convenient. It's also wrong.
"Purdue Pharma hired Rudolph Giuliani, the former New York mayor and now Donald Trump’s lawyer, to head off a federal investigation in the mid-2000s into the company’s marketing of the powerful prescription painkiller at the" [1]. (The Sacklers disproportionately donated to the GOP [2]. I see no evidence of them continuing that under MAGA.)
To the extent the people who "kill[ed] millions by 'fueling the current opioid crisis'" had a role in the vaccine debate, it's by hitching up to the anti-vaxers.
[1] https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/may/22/rudy-giulian...
[2] https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2019/04/purdue-pharma-and-t...
Nonsense
How is a person supposed to tell the fine grained difference between the perpetrators of cruelty?
It is all the establishment. Largely private actors ( doctors, lawyers, school teachers...) backed up with state scantioned violence in the end
Not sure what world you’re living in. But in mine, most people are not committing mass murder.
Why, then, does "the establishment" (by your conflation of these things) sue itself?
"The establishment" is a relative term. It is all those %!! over there.
All those you mention are a part of it, a grinding machine that gobbles up people's lives and destroys them, because rules.
...and blah blah blah
You get all those services if you conform and obey.
E.g: Waiting in pain with a broken arm in hospital, no pain relief (nitros oxide was the appropriate drug) because you look like you might enjoy it
That is my personal experience.
So do not lecture me
True. That is a fact I believe
But pull out a bit for a wider view: The establishment that said "trust us" over vaccines was the same establishment that made billions from killing millions by "fueling the current opioid crisis"