News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:One-man spam campaign ravages EU 'Chat Control' bill by varispeed on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @08:03AM (#45515201)
Another one: someone buys a sports car and promises to drive within legal speed limits at all times.
Re:One-man spam campaign ravages EU 'Chat Control' bill by dgfitz on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @08:06AM (#45515228)
Nobody does that.
Re:One-man spam campaign ravages EU 'Chat Control' bill by swiftcoder on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @08:33AM (#45515456)
I mean, every person who purchases a car does so, at least implicitly. The very act of obtaining a driving license contains an (often explicit) promise to abide by the rules of the road.
Re:One-man spam campaign ravages EU 'Chat Control' bill by dgfitz on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @08:10PM (#45522039)
You’re conflating two things and ignoring the thrust of the point: nobody buys a fast car to drive it slowly. Maybe some people do, the vast majority do not.

If promises about licenses meant a damn, we wouldn’t have speeding cameras.

Re:One-man spam campaign ravages EU 'Chat Control' bill by swiftcoder on Thursday October 09, 2025 @04:17AM (#45524949)
The promise is still made, regardless of whether one plans to keep it
Re:One-man spam campaign ravages EU 'Chat Control' bill by dgfitz on Thursday October 09, 2025 @11:27PM (#45535140)
No, the “promise” is forced. It’s like an arranged marriage.
Re:One-man spam campaign ravages EU 'Chat Control' bill by Kim_Bruning on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @04:04PM (#45520009)
Except in Germany!

(Technically correct is the best kind of correct)

Re:One-man spam campaign ravages EU 'Chat Control' bill by wizzwizz4 on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @04:31PM (#45520266)
I believe the Autobahn still carries the legal requirement to drive at a safe speed at all times. Pedal to the floor racing is not often safe speeds for a public road.
Re:One-man spam campaign ravages EU 'Chat Control' bill by criemen on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @05:02PM (#45520618)
Yes, yet [1] happened where someone took precautions to drive safely at >400 km/h speed.

[1] https://www.drivencarguide.co.nz/news/no-charges-laid-on-bug...

Re:One-man spam campaign ravages EU 'Chat Control' bill by pxc on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @05:52PM (#45521019)
It sounds like an investigation was quite reasonable, and then it cleared him before charges were pressed. Seems pretty good!
Re:One-man spam campaign ravages EU 'Chat Control' bill by cyanydeez on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @08:10AM (#45515271)
Still going tp need a plan against fascists new hybrid warfare. Brexit and Trump are the long tails of Business+Fascism, with Russia, Israel and China using social media and telecoms to grift and foment antidemocratic forces.
Re:One-man spam campaign ravages EU 'Chat Control' bill by cyanydeez on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @02:27PM (#45519121)
Looks like I upset the manosphere.
Re:One-man spam campaign ravages EU 'Chat Control' bill by ronsor on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @04:27PM (#45520235)
Sir, this is a comment thread about speed limits.
Re:One-man spam campaign ravages EU 'Chat Control' bill by tomhow on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @08:59PM (#45522293)
> Looks like I upset the manosphere.

Please. Your comment was plain old flamebait that's clearly against the guidelines, particularly these ones.

Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive.

Please don't fulminate. Please don't sneer...

Eschew flamebait. Avoid generic tangents. Omit internet tropes.

Please don't use Hacker News for political or ideological battle. It tramples curiosity.

Users did the right thing to flag that comment, simply because it's against the guidelines and the intended use of this site. Please take a moment to read them and make an effort to observe them if you want to keep participating here.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re:One-man spam campaign ravages EU 'Chat Control' bill by Integrape on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @12:56PM (#45518214)
A better one: the large number of individuals who drive super-duty pickup trucks only for commuting to their office jobs.
Re:One-man spam campaign ravages EU 'Chat Control' bill by Terr_ on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @05:47PM (#45520988)
IMO that's a little different since many of them also buying the utility of appearances, which be flaunted at entirely legal speeds or even while parked.

In contrast, an expensive speedy car disguised as a cheap slow one would be much more suspicious.

Re:One-man spam campaign ravages EU 'Chat Control' bill by westmeal on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @08:03PM (#45521990)
Allow me to introduce you to sleepers which are somewhat expensive cars disguised as cheap pieces of shit. Most I've been in are absolutely terrifying but seem like lots of fun.
Re:One-man spam campaign ravages EU 'Chat Control' bill by collingreen on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @06:08PM (#45521156)
There are also ways to drive fast legally
Re:One-man spam campaign ravages EU 'Chat Control' bill by nine_k on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @05:53PM (#45521033)
A sports car could be bought just for the looks.
Re:One-man spam campaign ravages EU 'Chat Control' bill by potato3732842 on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @05:56PM (#45521060)
Based on how often I find myself watching laden work vans pass vehicles that can easily "do better" this, or something like it, is likely a common reason for purchase
Re:One-man spam campaign ravages EU 'Chat Control' bill by wiseowise on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @05:58PM (#45521088)
You can buy fancy sports car for looks and status.
Re:One-man spam campaign ravages EU 'Chat Control' bill by delaminator on Thursday October 09, 2025 @07:46AM (#45526309)
"and my successors will all do the same"