To not just link to another thread: The specialty of ljharbs issues sits somewhere between "JavaScript is a very dynamic programming language that grew a lot and quite fast" and "we cannot trust developers to do the right thing".

His libraries tend to build up on older runtime implementations and freeze every used functionality during runtime, so they provide "second-run safety" and "backwards compatibility". Developers disagree with some of its effects, such as a grown dependency tree and impacts in performance of multiple magnitudes (as measured in micro-benchmarks). ljharb seems to follow a rather strong ideology, but is a member of the TC39 group and a highly trusted person.

ljharb is also conveniently paid per download. His actions border on malicious especially when viewing from a supply chain attack angle.

https://github.com/A11yance/axobject-query/pull/354#issuecom...

Also, I imagine cost of the globally wasted CPU cycles is much higher than what he profits. It's a pure abuse of resources.

It definitely feels a bit strange and potentially alarming, but after reading through that whole thread he ultimately seems like a sincere person doing work that he thinks matters, now getting dogpiled for it.

I haven't found one person who agrees with him on what he thinks matters. His way is wasteful and slow and just indefensible.

If he had kept his strange and alarming behavior to himself, he wouldn't be 'getting dogpiled' for it now.

The problem is that he's forcing his ways on others. If we're identifying an aggressor here, it's him. The project maintainers are the victims.

At least in the thread linked here, it seems like his maintainership over the project is legitimate, which makes it wrong to characterize him as "forcing" his ways on anyone.

Even ignoring that examples of his behavior are easily found elsewhere, the link itself shows him completely disregarding feedback from other contributors to force his own way.

Honestly, I can't understand the intent behind such a defensive rebuttal to the criticism of his actions.

I don't care one way or another. I'm not a JS developer. I'm just struck by a reaction that seems quite extreme, and very visible dogpiling.

My point wasn't about javascript. He got pushback because he ignored everyone and just did his own thing. It has nothing to do with javascript and you can see that in the link. That's a weird excuse.

I don't have much to add myself, but there was a bit of discussion around this back in August that you might be interested in: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44831811

Wow! Didn't know Immich's Cursed page had already a dedicated post on HN.

I love reading about opensource drama, especially if it's some technology I don't use directly, it's like watching a soap opera.

This user makes money of off how many downloads their packages receive.

https://github.com/A11yance/axobject-query/pull/354#issuecom...

What a dumpster fire.

Is he really being paid per download, or is he just being sponsored? It’s not clear if either would imply some form of malicious intent either.

Seems like this thread answers your question https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37604373