Re:Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores
by onionisafruit on Tuesday September 30, 2025 @07:50PM
(#45432729)
If they both top out at 60 they are equally fast. One just had better acceleration than the other
Re:Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores
by dzhiurgis on Tuesday September 30, 2025 @10:30PM
(#45433707)
Top speed hardly matters for cars. Acceleration is where fun is. Not sure this applies to CPUs at all.
Re:Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores
by jychang on Tuesday September 30, 2025 @10:49PM
(#45433820)
Any cpu can run at 100ghz for 1 cycle. The trick is getting it to run at 100ghz forever
Re:Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores
by saagarjha on Wednesday October 01, 2025 @05:38AM
(#45435927)
I think the speed of light would like to have a word with you.
Re:Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores
by pmontra on Wednesday October 01, 2025 @01:26AM
(#45434545)
Cornering speed is where real fun is. And danger.
Re:Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores
by hbogert on Wednesday October 01, 2025 @02:40AM
(#45434981)
Acceleration is actually a thing. The CPU needs to ramp up cycles fast if it wants to feel snappy. It needs to wind down as soon as no significant workload is there anymore. All needed for good efficiency
Re:Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores
by sib on Wednesday October 01, 2025 @02:30AM
(#45434925)
Yes - typically the (US English, at least) jargon is "quick" for acceleration and "fast" for top speed...
Re:Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores
by olyjohn on Wednesday October 01, 2025 @01:22PM
(#45440392)
Nah not really. When you watch drag racing, they're testing acceleration. One car is always faster. Nobody says one is quicker than the other. Quick (when referring to straight line speed) is reserved for cars like the Miata, which has decent acceleration, but certainly can't accelerate like a muscle car. Nobody really compares top speed all that much because it's damn near impossible to hit top speed in a lot of cars, even on a race track. You will find slower cars comparing top speed though. Like an MG Midget, or an early Honda Civic might be able to hit 100mph, but that's an easily attainable speed. Fast cars are just faster than quick cars.
Interestingly, Gemini agrees with me:
>>In the context of cars:
>>"Fast" refers to top speed. A fast car has a high maximum velocity. It can cover a great distance in a sustained manner once it reaches its peak speed. Think of the Bugatti Chiron or a Koenigsegg, which are famous for their incredibly high top speeds.
>>"Quick" refers to acceleration. A quick car can get from a standstill to a certain speed (often 0 to 60 mph or 0 to 100 km/h) in a very short amount of time. This is about how rapidly the car can change its velocity. Modern electric vehicles, like the Tesla Model S Plaid or the Lucid Air Sapphire, are prime examples of exceptionally quick cars due to the instant torque of their electric motors.
Re:Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores
by mrheosuper on Tuesday September 30, 2025 @11:08PM
(#45433912)
The first car is much more fun to ride
Re:Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores
by NetMageSCW on Wednesday October 01, 2025 @01:09AM
(#45434438)
Only if all you care about is a straight line.
Re:Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores
by mrheosuper on Wednesday October 01, 2025 @02:14AM
(#45434818)
I assume everything else is the same, or else it will be apple and orange.
A car that does this in 4 seconds is still fast (though twice as slow)