Wait until you find out what else you can't question about Israel

I read your message several times and I have no idea what you are saying.

Lots of people question the existence of a genocide, because with Israel taking steps to minimize casualties (ordering evacuations for example) there is clearly no intent, which is the most important part.

The collateral damage rates are also extemely low for an urban warfare against guerillas, which again makes it clear there is no genocide. If there was, the death rate would be something like 100x times higher.

It’s not genocide. Your use of the term is correct. There is a war.

83% civilian casualty rate from one of the most well funded and developed military in the world. They have the precision they just don't want to use it.

That is at least 150% more than the casualty rate of civilians in Germany and Japan, after the holocaust, firebombing Dresden, and two nuclear bombs combined

83% is a "new misleading number", based on how many killed combatants IDF has identified.

in other words, if IDF killed somebody with rpg/mortar/ak47 but it doesn't know who it is exactly - it counted as civilian.

going with IDF numbers from Israeli press, it's 22,000 killed combatants as of August. Latest hamas number of casualties is 66,000 (including combatants)

[delayed]

really, this is how it's counted ? can you please show me 1 country that identified all enemy soldiers that it killed in order for them to be counted as dead combatants ?

also, you do insist that if somebody is blown up while holding rpg he is counted as civilian because his identity is unknown ?