tguvot

so hilariously american approach. discussion site with prohibition to have discussion under disguise of "battle".

the only place where facts with links are getting downvoted and flagged.

the only place where moderator pretends that everything is ok and in violation of guidelines accuses people of acting in bad faith when they ask him about this.

fish rots from the head

i btw asked you to ban me a couple of years ago. thank you for finally doing it.

excuses excuses

here is for you modern day hamas minister claiming that half of palestinians are egyptian and half are saudis. literally arab occupiers

https://web.archive.org/web/20210728073329/https://www.memri...

no. but they were killed and raped by palestinians and belonging stolen at 1858. looks like tradition.

btw, here is an interesting quote from PLO commander Zuheir Mohsen (sounds palestinian enough for you ?):

"The Palestinian people does not exist … there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians, and Lebanese. Between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese there are no differences. We are all part of one people, the Arab nation [...] Just for political reasons we carefully underwrite our Palestinian identity. Because it is of national interest for the Arabs to advocate the existence of Palestinians to balance Zionism. Yes, the existence of a separate Palestinian identity exists only for tactical reasons[...] Once we have acquired all our rights in all of Palestine, we must not delay for a moment the reunification of Jordan and Palestine".

did you know that John Steinbeck's great-grandfather, Frederick Steinbeck, was murdered, and his great-grandmother and her sister were raped in 1858 near Jaffa by not zionists ? and their possession stolen.

or this not on tiktok yet ?

I wonder why would you drop the middle out of the quote where he talks about finding for them employment in other countries ?

"We shall try to spirit the penniless population across the border by procuring employment for it in the transit countries, while denying it any employment in our own country"

and what happened in reality, is that with arrival of Zionists area got economically developed and it resulted in migration of 100k-400k of arabs into mandatory territory in search of employment.

in your opinion, are they also not natives and should leave now ?

4000 deliveries in march of 2025. 50000 pregnant woman [1]

50,000 births by july of 2024 (starting with october 7th 2023) [2]

you can sum and extrapolate the numbers. you can probably find more numbers about births

[1] https://www.savethechildren.net/news/about-130-children-born...

[2] https://www.savethechildren.net/news/women-self-inducing-lab...

hacking f-91w been very popular

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casio_F-91W#Usage_in_terrorism

Reading through their comment history, it doesn't seem like a good-faith comment. Not sure what they thought HN stood to gain from their contribution here.

in 2019 internet shutdown happened just before crackdown on protests

i'll leave it as exercise to a reader

(going with recent ipv6 discussion) they probably failed to make it work properly and decided that it's easier to block it

pretty sure that all decisions are published. protocols of the meetings as well

all i was asking if genx "are low skilled know-nothings living on auto pilot inside media propagated memes about America" or did you mistyped

genx or genz ?

actual list https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/01/with...

any way to update url in submission ?

a) they were not ethnically cleansed. even article says "displaced". this is what usually called "internally displaced". My relatives in Ukraine are "internally displaced". There was also 500k Israeli that were internally displaced during war.

b) most of cities/population in gaza is west of yellow line

d) CMCC is currently developing protocols for how to let population move east of yellow line (while preventing militants doing so), because this is where international community starts reconstruction efforts and where ISF will be deployed

here we go. you finally used (by mistake, but we won't count this against you) appropriate verb: "displaced". population in gaza is displaced but still in gaza.

While on the other side population of Nagorno Karabakh was ethnically cleansed from Nagorno Karabakh and had to leave to Armenia.

so not genocide ?

"doing it over and over again", you mean war moves around and not restricted to same 1 square kilometer.

and what kind of ethnic cleansing it is, if all population remains in gaza.

the trick is, to shift goalposts. if you bomb city with population: genocide. if you order people to evacuate it's ethnic cleansing.

if you want to see how ethnic cleansing actually looks, i'll suggest to take a look at what azeri did a while ago.

there are no statements of intents with exception of mistranslated and partial hebrew quotes.

i read arguments in full. it mix of cherry picked news, mistranslated/irrelevant quotes and total avoidance of "uncomfortable facts" that go against the narrative.

you surely read on the other side few of 400 page long documents that debunk it ?

"army ordered civilians to evacuate from warzone so it's genocide" is not as great argument as you think.

if army had prevented civilians to leave city and then bombed it to the ground, you would have something to talk about.

in my example countries stated that they will arrest diplomat covered by diplomatic immunity based on icc warrant. not local citizens.

in case international law is not binding, than whatever US did is ok.

and according to usa it was law enforcement operation. not invasion. just like uk and france didn't invade but casually bombed

at flight that I had bunch of years ago i peeked into printed out manuscript that guy sitting next to me was reading. it was something about "explosive formation of underwater shock wave and how it influences metal hulls". might have included something like DOD and MIL at footer.

later I tried to google some of the phrases that I remembered, but couldn't find anything

i have roomba with camera. it has no problem enforcing exclusion zone and does precise navigation decisions when it needs to move around

worldbank data is off almost by factor of 2

from israeli site:

The 2021 budget framework for the "Ministry of Defense" includes an expenditure budget of NIS 62.357 billion, in addition to NIS 14.972 billion in income-contingent expenditure and authorization to commit in the amount of NIS 36.3 billion.

In 2022, the framework for the budget includes an expenditure budget of NIS 59.833 billion, in addition to NIS 15 billion in income-contingent expenditure and authorization to commit in the amount of NIS 42.9 billion.

my point is that diplomatic immunity is international law. signatories to rome statue said that they will violate it (diplomatic immunity of Israeli head of state) because of icc warrant.

this is violation of international law that multiple countries openly stated that they will perform.

essentially it means that international law is not binding and selectively enforced. this is slippery slope.

if you can ignore vienna convention why not ignore whatever other part of international law that prohibits invasion ?

PS. UK and France just bombed ISIS in Syria. Is it also invasion and morally wrong ?

Vienna Convention (1961): This treaty standardized the rules, making diplomatic immunity a binding obligation for its over 190 signatory nations

And then comes ICC (via Rome statue, ratified by 125 countries and half a dozen of them in process of withdrawal) and trashes with it warrants diplomatic immunity.

So in case international law/treaty from 1961 is all of sudden not binding, why wouldn't uniliteral invasion (actually it looks like it more of arrest operation) (which is probably prohibited by some other international treaties) not be ok ?

i saw on cnn site list of reactions from europe. it looks like at most they are slightly annoyed but probably cheering on the background.

i was pointing out that diplomatic immunity (of head of state) that you mention is trashed by ICC warrants (in countries who are party to it. i.e. good chunk of europe).

so, in the moment that something as basic as diplomatic immunity can be violated by warrants for investigation (not for trial), invading another country to arrest somebody based on warrants that you had issued domestically is not that big of leap