drekipus
Between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. I cannot use YouTube, Vivaldi, The real estate app, WhatsApp, etc.
If I want to unblock it I have to wait down a 3-minute timer to make sure that I really want to turn off the blocker
Most of us are trying to make a better society for ourselves and our families, so there's a lot more that we unify over rather than disagree on.
The power structures don't want us to unify though, because that would be threatening.
"The prophecies foretold!"
(Aside, I just finished reading the mistborn trilogy)
Naturally ventilated airports would probably have issues with fumes. Might not be a great idea.
If I believe correctly the Dyson headquarters was designed to be fairly efficient as well.
My father in laws house was intentionally designed to be naturally ventilated, thermal mass concrete slab in the middle, etc. And it's comfortably cool even on 40 degree days.
I'll happily admit I'm wrong though, in light of evidence before me
I just wanted to check the OPs survey because it could have been something different i.e.: that supports the claim
I want to write a book about software engineering, but I want to make it applicable for people. So I've put up the above survey so that people can share some of their thoughts and experiences.
Please feel free to fill in the questionnaire or write some comments below if you have some ideas on what you're looking for.
This is new to me, where does he say this specifically?
Not to white knight Casey but his niche has been in rendering and graphics afaik , where everything he does have to fit inbetween frames, so it makes sense to be a "performance maximalist" in that environment.
It could be that you and he are working on different sets of problems with different tools.
But I'd be really interested I where he says you must write unmaintainable code.
Also (my take) : if you're looking at "clean code" to find abstractions that allow things to be refactored, then I think that's probably not the type of performance he's talking about for you. LLMs can do that type of work. FWIW I think he refactors from what things ought to be, not how they are currently
Usually it can be that the complex artifact is the simplest to implement. It's harder to make the simple thing
Classic, Rich Hicky, "simple made, easy" talk reference.
I think there is almost a split between people who have read ZAOMM and people who have not.
I recently made a post in my circles about how "meaning" is what human quality is. If you look at classical art a lot of it could look objectively nonsense and have technical mistakes, but just because the machine can make a picture does not mean that it attributes any meaning or communicate any intention. The difference between human-made classical artwork and machine-made classical artwork is the meaning and symbology behind it
Yeah this is precisely the exact opposite of what the article is talking about.
An LLM can't find anything interesting except that it parroted the word interesting from prior written human text.
Our only reference point with an alien philosophy would be that we can only approach it from human basis