News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tai Lopez charged by SEC in ponzi scheme by defen on Monday September 29, 2025 @01:28AM (#45410579)
> I think he was one of the first to realize that you could take regular YouTube videos that are several minutes long and turn them into skippable pre-roll ads, and some people would watch the whole thing.

I'm struggling to understand what this means. He put lots of ads on his videos? Or something else.

Re:Tai Lopez charged by SEC in ponzi scheme by j_bum on Monday September 29, 2025 @01:33AM (#45410606)
He would pay to have his videos as ads on other people’s videos.

E.g., I’d go to watch a video of SmarterEveryDay, and Tai Lopez would show up as an ad, telling me all about his Lamborghinis and bookshelves of books he’d never read. And people would just watch the full ad, even after they could’ve skipped (5s).

That was an interesting era of YouTube, for sure.

Re:Tai Lopez charged by SEC in ponzi scheme by josephjrobison on Monday September 29, 2025 @02:03AM (#45410749)
This is an example of the fact that while only 1% would watch the whole thing, they just raised their hands as the marks, to be worked on through the whole funnel.
Re:Tai Lopez charged by SEC in ponzi scheme by whywhywhywhy on Monday September 29, 2025 @07:10AM (#45412328)
A view counts as a view before the full video though, so running it as an ad still makes it look like you have an audience.
Re:Tai Lopez charged by SEC in ponzi scheme by mk89 on Monday September 29, 2025 @01:39AM (#45410624)
Is that against TOS? Was it scam?
Re:Tai Lopez charged by SEC in ponzi scheme by modeless on Monday September 29, 2025 @01:53AM (#45410689)
It's not against YouTube's ToS to run pre-roll ads of any length, of course. But I think he was just selling get-rich-quick schemes or something. At the time YouTube ads were more rare and generally short, like 15 second TV commercials, so it was weird to see long-form content as ads. He absolutely saturated the site with this ad for a while to the point that it became a meme. I'm guessing a significant percentage of YouTube's user base at the time was served that ad at least once.
Re:Tai Lopez charged by SEC in ponzi scheme by SpicyUme on Monday September 29, 2025 @04:19PM (#45418260)
Yeah I still occasionally get really long ads that must be just to see who watches all (most?) of them.
Re:Tai Lopez charged by SEC in ponzi scheme by showmexyz on Monday September 29, 2025 @01:48AM (#45410669)
He defrauded investers out of $120M.
Re:Tai Lopez charged by SEC in ponzi scheme by MangoToupe on Monday September 29, 2025 @05:32AM (#45411823)
I couldn't find any record of a conviction with a cursory google
Re:Tai Lopez charged by SEC in ponzi scheme by showmexyz on Monday September 29, 2025 @06:01AM (#45411979)
Re:Tai Lopez charged by SEC in ponzi scheme by vintermann on Monday September 29, 2025 @10:34AM (#45414345)
When people leave autoplay on, they might not even realize they watched an ad, I guess?
Re:Tai Lopez charged by SEC in ponzi scheme by mrguyorama on Monday September 29, 2025 @01:13PM (#45416242)
There are armies of bad parents or babysitters that just hand baby an Ipad, not on child or restricted mode, and just let youtube literally Clockwork Orange a human being.

It's horrifying.