News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GPT-5-Codex by robotswantdata on Monday September 15, 2025 @03:25PM (#45253888)
Codex CLI IDE just works, very impressed with the quality. If you tried it a while back and didn’t like it, try it again via the vscode extension generous usage included with plus.

Ditched my Claude code max sub for the ChatGPT pro $200 plan. So much faster, and not hit any limits yet.

Re:GPT-5-Codex by steinvakt2 on Monday September 15, 2025 @03:41PM (#45254052)
Im using Cursor with the $20 plan and hit rate limits after 15 days (so im paying extra the rest of the month). What do you recommend I do?
Re:GPT-5-Codex by robotswantdata on Monday September 15, 2025 @03:48PM (#45254132)
You could get two plus accounts? Or maybe a business account with two seats?

The $200 pro feels good value personally.

Re:GPT-5-Codex by poszlem on Monday September 15, 2025 @03:44PM (#45254083)
Wait, what? They now allow claude code like subscription instead of the API too?
Re:GPT-5-Codex by robotswantdata on Monday September 15, 2025 @03:46PM (#45254101)
Yes for at least a month. Download the vscode extension and sign in with ChatGPT
Re:GPT-5-Codex by Tiberium on Monday September 15, 2025 @04:27PM (#45254533)
Yes, just do "codex login" and it'll use your ChatGPT subscription.
Re:GPT-5-Codex by energy123 on Tuesday September 16, 2025 @02:37AM (#45258777)
Do you also get free Codex CLI usage?
Re:GPT-5-Codex by what on Monday September 15, 2025 @10:01PM (#45257191)
>CLI IDE

What?

Re:GPT-5-Codex by robotswantdata on Tuesday September 16, 2025 @12:02AM (#45257907)
Codex cli Vscode extension https://developers.openai.com/codex/ide
Re:GPT-5-Codex by swyx on Tuesday September 16, 2025 @02:09AM (#45258597)
just drop the "cli" part of it?
Re:GPT-5-Codex by ritz_labringue on Tuesday September 16, 2025 @05:46AM (#45260123)
Well, it's really a VSCode extension that lets you run Codex CLI in the IDE. Not the "cloud" version of Codex... So GP is technically correct
Re:GPT-5-Codex by faangguyindia on Monday September 15, 2025 @11:27PM (#45257738)
i just use aider + gemini pro, here's the project i developed: https://aretecodex.pages.dev/tools/
Re:GPT-5-Codex by aitchnyu on Tuesday September 16, 2025 @01:03AM (#45258190)
Did anybody switch away from Aider for a compelling alternative? What was the feature?
Re:GPT-5-Codex by dsrtslnd23 on Tuesday September 16, 2025 @01:50AM (#45258488)
I still like aider but multi-step agentic flows are very useful so I mostly use codex and claude nowadays. If I want to do very specific edits I use aider.
Re:GPT-5-Codex by faangguyindia on Tuesday September 16, 2025 @01:58AM (#45258524)
I don't find multiple agents helpful at all for coding, here you can see i am running a modded aider and single shot most features, https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTCoding/comments/1nh7bu1/3_ph...

I also use claude or codex but i do not find them much useful for what i do.

Re:GPT-5-Codex by aitchnyu on Tuesday September 16, 2025 @05:23AM (#45259962)
Where does regular Aider fall short?
Re:GPT-5-Codex by faangguyindia on Tuesday September 16, 2025 @06:59AM (#45260601)
bruh, i posted a video for you to see where it falls short. If you are an aider user you can tell based on video what it can or cannot do.
Re:GPT-5-Codex by gen220 on Tuesday September 16, 2025 @10:03AM (#45262411)
I was a #1 aider stan for months, but ultimately switched to Claude Code.

For me it was (1) lack of MCP (2) excessive hand-holding required (3) availability of the Max plan meant I wouldn't have to monitor cost.

Claude Code's skill curve felt slightly longer than aider's, and had a higher ceiling.

I think if I were more cost-sensitive, I would give Aider another whirl, or Gemini CLI (based on what I've heard, I haven't used it yet).

Re:GPT-5-Codex by raincole on Tuesday September 16, 2025 @02:32AM (#45258744)
Why not Gemini CLI tho?
Re:GPT-5-Codex by faangguyindia on Tuesday September 16, 2025 @04:18AM (#45259512)
gemini cli is such a trash it has ruined gemini 2.5 pro model's reputation, now people think it's incapable of writing good code.
Re:GPT-5-Codex by PrayagS on Tuesday September 16, 2025 @07:11AM (#45260667)
True. In my experience, it has been good to use for second opinions and code reviews. Usually in CC/Codex via an MCP like zen.
Re:GPT-5-Codex by theshrike79 on Tuesday September 16, 2025 @03:56AM (#45259335)
It doesn't have a working plan mode.

If you ask it to plan something or suggest something. It'll write the suggestion and dive right into implementation with zero hesitation.

Re:GPT-5-Codex by TomaszZielinski on Tuesday September 16, 2025 @11:00AM (#45263243)
It's not my experience, but then I have a „living” GEMINI.md doc where I add/clarify/tweak what to do and what not to do. And it's possible the initial revision already contained the correct spell :)
Re:GPT-5-Codex by barrenko on Tuesday September 16, 2025 @02:50AM (#45258873)
it sucks.
Re:GPT-5-Codex by raincole on Tuesday September 16, 2025 @03:14AM (#45259049)
The opposite of my experience, but okay.
Re:GPT-5-Codex by barrenko on Tuesday September 16, 2025 @04:02AM (#45259379)
I'll give it another try, the gemini models themselves are great for me, tried the tool when it came out, didn't gel with it.
Re:GPT-5-Codex by robotswantdata on Tuesday September 16, 2025 @10:07AM (#45262458)
Do not let Gemini CLI write code for you. You will find out the hard way