Re:Over 100 ships have sailed with fake insurance from the N...
by newyankee on Friday September 12, 2025 @10:20AM
(#45222453)
Anything not validated by NATO/ USA is fake, rest of the world should adhere to their terms and definitions as the high seas are owned by them
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Over 100 ships have sailed with fake insurance from the N...
by polotics on Friday September 12, 2025 @10:22AM
(#45222485)
Definitely no. The "fake" here is about certainty that no insurance payout would occur in case of issue, meaning for example an oil tanker accidently dumping tons of black goo onto some english seaside resort, no compensation would come out of anywhere.
Re:Over 100 ships have sailed with fake insurance from the N...
by vintermann on Friday September 12, 2025 @10:46AM
(#45222720)
How reliable is liability insurance for that sort of thing, generally speaking?
Re:Over 100 ships have sailed with fake insurance from the N...
by ceejayoz on Friday September 12, 2025 @10:52AM
(#45222784)
Quite. The real insurers are large, old, and have long made a name for themselves in this regard. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lloyd%27s_of_London
Re:Over 100 ships have sailed with fake insurance from the N...
by SanjayMehta on Friday September 12, 2025 @09:38PM
(#45228599)
So existing legacy monopolies are real and all newcomers are fake. Got it.
Re:Over 100 ships have sailed with fake insurance from the N...
by ceejayoz on Saturday September 13, 2025 @09:34AM
(#45231977)
Nah. The smaller new ones reinsure via folks like Lloyds. It’s quite complex.
The company in this article could have done that, but they forged documents to avoid it. They had no intention of covering accidents - it was just plain fake to get these ships into ports.
Re:Over 100 ships have sailed with fake insurance from the N...
by throwawaysleep on Friday September 12, 2025 @10:22AM
(#45222477)
They were not truly insured.