News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Top model scores may be skewed by Git history leaks in SW... by mustaphah on Thursday September 11, 2025 @05:40PM (#45216393)
> You're all extremely clever and I can't seem to understand how you missed thinking about such a simple edge case [...]

I wouldn't be surprised if they left this loophole on purpose to give some (their?) agents extra leverage.

Edit #1: I didn't mean to imply bad intent; just thinking out loud.

Edit #2: Please, downvote responsibly. I deserve every one. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0FHEeG_uq5Y

Re:Top model scores may be skewed by Git history leaks in SW... by gchamonlive on Thursday September 11, 2025 @06:33PM (#45216793)
> I didn't mean to imply bad intent

> I wouldn't be surprised if they left this loophole on purpose

You didn't imply bad intent, you outright suggested it.

Re:Top model scores may be skewed by Git history leaks in SW... by coldtea on Thursday September 11, 2025 @07:00PM (#45216966)
He means he doesn't say it was necessarily bad intent, but mentions it as a possibility ("thinking out loud").
Re:Top model scores may be skewed by Git history leaks in SW... by gchamonlive on Saturday September 13, 2025 @04:12PM (#45234957)
Thinking out loud isn't a free pass to say stuff without consequences. Sure we are all protected under free speech, but free speech doesn't remove the meaning and the impact words have in the world.
Re:Top model scores may be skewed by Git history leaks in SW... by mustaphah on Thursday September 11, 2025 @06:45PM (#45216867)
I could've phrased it better.
Re:Top model scores may be skewed by Git history leaks in SW... by gchamonlive on Thursday September 11, 2025 @06:57PM (#45216948)
You could rewrite it a 1000 times, if the underlying idea is the same, suggesting something you don't know it's true, the outcome would be the same. Or did you mean something else? What was your intention with the message?
Re:Top model scores may be skewed by Git history leaks in SW... by mustaphah on Thursday September 11, 2025 @07:19PM (#45217115)
I meant it as a hint for anyone inclined to dig deeper. It's a possibility rather than something we can confidently dismiss.
Re:Top model scores may be skewed by Git history leaks in SW... by gchamonlive on Thursday September 11, 2025 @07:28PM (#45217158)
If it's a possibility and you don't want to dig deeper better to sit out and not comment anything at all, lest you risk defamation.

Thinking out loud also doesn't make defamation acceptable.

Re:Top model scores may be skewed by Git history leaks in SW... by TheDong on Thursday September 11, 2025 @11:31PM (#45218410)
It's fine, this is an american site so JAQing is in fact safe under free speech.

You're welcome to ask b "would none rid me of this meddlesome priest" with no fear

Re:Top model scores may be skewed by Git history leaks in SW... by gchamonlive on Friday September 12, 2025 @05:22AM (#45220301)
And I'm protected under free speech to try to educate people about good manners, so it's fine too.
Re:Top model scores may be skewed by Git history leaks in SW... by Dylan16807 on Friday September 12, 2025 @05:31PM (#45227003)
"It's probably not X, but we should consider X as we look at this." and "I feel like this might be X but I'm 50:50 on it." are not anywhere near defamation. You have to get a lot closer to certainty before it's an issue.

And listing out "a possibility but you don't want to dig deeper" is often a good contribution to a conversation.

In this case they worded it badly, but the basic idea of the comment isn't awful.

Re:Top model scores may be skewed by Git history leaks in SW... by gchamonlive on Friday September 12, 2025 @06:11PM (#45227333)
That someone in the team might not have done it on purpose, but left it for convenience? How does that benefit the debate? I really fail to see any silver lining in doing such speculative comments without any substance whatsoever to back it up.
Re:Top model scores may be skewed by Git history leaks in SW... by cjsaltlake on Thursday September 11, 2025 @05:53PM (#45216496)
We absolutely did not.
Re:Top model scores may be skewed by Git history leaks in SW... by coldtea on Thursday September 11, 2025 @07:01PM (#45216971)
Of course that's what a team that did it on purpose would also say :)
Re:Top model scores may be skewed by Git history leaks in SW... by faangguyindia on Friday September 12, 2025 @12:20AM (#45218613)
never attribute something to malice which can be attributed to incompetence. Basically, this has been utilized plenty of times by some really smart folk to get what they want.