Re:Top model scores may be skewed by Git history leaks in SW...
by TheDong on Thursday September 11, 2025 @11:31PM
(#45218410)
It's fine, this is an american site so JAQing is in fact safe under free speech.
You're welcome to ask b "would none rid me of this meddlesome priest" with no fear
Re:Top model scores may be skewed by Git history leaks in SW...
by gchamonlive on Friday September 12, 2025 @05:22AM
(#45220301)
And I'm protected under free speech to try to educate people about good manners, so it's fine too.
Re:Top model scores may be skewed by Git history leaks in SW...
by Dylan16807 on Friday September 12, 2025 @05:31PM
(#45227003)
"It's probably not X, but we should consider X as we look at this." and "I feel like this might be X but I'm 50:50 on it." are not anywhere near defamation. You have to get a lot closer to certainty before it's an issue.
And listing out "a possibility but you don't want to dig deeper" is often a good contribution to a conversation.
In this case they worded it badly, but the basic idea of the comment isn't awful.
Re:Top model scores may be skewed by Git history leaks in SW...
by gchamonlive on Friday September 12, 2025 @06:11PM
(#45227333)
That someone in the team might not have done it on purpose, but left it for convenience? How does that benefit the debate? I really fail to see any silver lining in doing such speculative comments without any substance whatsoever to back it up.
Thinking out loud also doesn't make defamation acceptable.