Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah
by rektomatic on Thursday September 11, 2025 @10:14AM
(#45211977)
Quit it with the fear mongering
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah
by mikepurvis on Thursday September 11, 2025 @10:49AM
(#45212345)
If this white Canadian woman traveling to California can be jailed for two weeks, then it can absolutely happen to anyone: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/19/canadian-det...
As a Canadian, I'm refusing to travel to the US right now, despite working remotely for a US-based company.
It's not fear mongering, it's real. But my motivation isn't even just fear; staying home or choosing to travel elsewhere (Europe, Asia, Mexico) is standing with my countrymen against a regime that doesn't respect our sovereignty or even its own laws.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah
by fawkesalbus on Thursday September 11, 2025 @11:55AM
(#45213070)
It can be argued that a lot of this is falling into the slippery slope fallacy.
Also the media doesn’t always report the full story. Often the people arrested have some small/medium offense from years ago.
Unlikely to happen to legal immigrants.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah
by mikepurvis on Thursday September 11, 2025 @12:03PM
(#45213160)
Nonetheless, I will continue to choose to spend my travel dollars elsewhere until the US administration is crystal clear that Canada is a sovereign country, due process is a thing, and vanning people off of street corners (regardless of their skin colour or immigration status) is not the way.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah
by TheCoelacanth on Thursday September 11, 2025 @01:06PM
(#45213834)
Many of them have a small offense that would justify them being turned away from the border, but not an offense that justifies detention.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah
by fawkesalbus on Thursday September 11, 2025 @03:11PM
(#45215079)
That’s fair. And if they can be turned away from the border, then they can be deported too.