News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The future of 32-bit support in the kernel. Parent comment

Re:The future of 32-bit support in the kernel by int_19h on Monday September 01, 2025 @09:46PM (#45098283)
It's not just Windows and JavaScript. On Apple platforms, NSString is UTF-16. On Linux, Qt uses UTF-16 strings. Looking at languages, we have Java (which is where JS got this bug from) and C# both enshrining it in their respective language specs.

So it's far more pervasive than people think, and will likely be in the picture for decades to come.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The future of 32-bit support in the kernel by electroly on Monday September 01, 2025 @11:25PM (#45098838)
ICU (International Components for Unicode, the library published by the Unicode folks) itself uses UTF-16 internally, and most of these things are built on ICU. I agree strongly with your conclusion--UTF-16 isn't going anywhere. I don't think the ICU people are even talking about changing the internals to UTF-8.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The future of 32-bit support in the kernel by account42 on Tuesday September 02, 2025 @04:17AM (#45100372)
Qt could really change if they wanted to and really should have by now - it's not like they keep long-term backwards compatibility anyway unlike the others that you mentioned.

Of course they chose to integrate JavaScript so that's less likely now.

[ Parent | on HN ]