News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Netflix Revamps Tudum's CQRS Architecture with Raw Hollow In-Memory Object Store. Parent comment

Re:Netflix Revamps Tudum's CQRS Architecture with Raw Hollow... by boxed on Tuesday August 19, 2025 @04:32AM (#44949518)
I mean, this is the company that invented microservices so....
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Netflix Revamps Tudum's CQRS Architecture with Raw Hollow... by moomoo11 on Tuesday August 19, 2025 @07:37AM (#44950470)
Microservices for _organizational_ challenges.

Lots of people think microservices = performance gains only.

It’s not. It’s mainly for organizational efficiency. You can’t be blocked from deploying fixes or features. Always be shipping. Without breaking someone else’s code.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Netflix Revamps Tudum's CQRS Architecture with Raw Hollow... by boxed on Tuesday August 19, 2025 @08:04AM (#44950624)
In fact, it's opposed to performance in many cases. And dev velocity for small teams.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Netflix Revamps Tudum's CQRS Architecture with Raw Hollow... by williamdclt on Tuesday August 19, 2025 @10:48AM (#44952183)
> Lots of people think microservices = performance gains only.

I don't think I ever heard that. Who claims that microservice architectures are for performance gains?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Netflix Revamps Tudum's CQRS Architecture with Raw Hollow... by moomoo11 on Tuesday August 19, 2025 @10:51AM (#44952220)
You’d be surprised, a lot during interviews I conducted. I think it’s mostly people that have not worked with them.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Netflix Revamps Tudum's CQRS Architecture with Raw Hollow... by thinkindie on Tuesday August 19, 2025 @05:39AM (#44949859)
very fair point - but there are valid use cases for microservices.
[ Parent | on HN ]