That's factually incorrect.
The recording device in my pocket comes into play, and afterwards my attorney seeks damages and fees.
Because these days with anything digital there's a risk of the other side claiming it's a genML fake.
Are there analog recorders with an "infinite" loop of tape so you get automatic overwriting without manual intervention?
> Because these days with anything digital there's a risk of the other side claiming it's a genML fake.
I think this type of thinking is quite cynical and overlooks an important factor: we have a presumption of innocence in this country, and these types of situations are adjudicated by reasonable, typically-intelligent, honest jurists - not computer programs.
If one party is asserting something is fake, they need evidence to do so: mere supposition isn't good enough, and if unsubstantiated, typically removes credibility from the accuser.
In this situation, no reasonable person is going to believe that believable video footage is going to be able to be fabricated on the fly - and to what end? Nobody was physically harmed, no property was damaged, and there are numerous witnesses who are very realistically risking their freedom and finances if they choose to corroborate an inaccurate restatement of facts.
Don't try to out-crazy a crazy person. That's not a game I'm going to play.