Re:Addictions Are Being Engineered
by ambicapter on Saturday June 28, 2025 @02:19PM
(#44406897)
By...not competing? As long as you're profitable (read: your expenses are lower than your incomes), what does competing to be "the best" (whatever that even means) provide you?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Addictions Are Being Engineered
by ngriffiths on Saturday June 28, 2025 @02:32PM
(#44406985)
I think in this context "competing" means having a meaningful market share, which would help reduce time the world spends on the alternative useless gamified/addictive apps
And if it gets meaningful ”market share”, the business incentives are pulling in the direction of growth, which is the articles point.
In many segments, especially ones served digitally, only one or a few companies will survive. It's very much "grow or die".
Pardon my ignorance but is that expensive to run a social platform?
Re:Addictions Are Being Engineered
by DeathRay2K on Saturday June 28, 2025 @02:58PM
(#44407200)
Running a social media platform can be very expensive, and it only gets more expensive every day.
Media takes a lot of storage and bandwidth, and you basically have unbounded costs if you want to meet user expectations for posting media.
Re:Addictions Are Being Engineered
by ambicapter on Saturday June 28, 2025 @05:32PM
(#44408342)
That's a narrative that makes no sense. If a company is profitable, it doesn't "die". If customers like your product and their friends are on your platform, they have no reason to leave to another.