Re:US Supreme Court limits federal judges' power to block Tr...
by vannevar on Friday June 27, 2025 @09:54PM
(#44401819)
Sure. And if their judgment is deemed incorrect, it will be overturned on appeal. If the matter is urgent, appeal will be expedited. That's how the system works. You can certainly argue that we need more courts to handle the current workload, but let's directly address that issue rather than curtailing the injunction power to reduce the work.
Bear in mind that this was a case where the multiple courts who considered the issue were unanimous in their opinion that the President was very likely to lose on the merits. Exactly the kind of case where there should be an injunction.
Re:US Supreme Court limits federal judges' power to block Tr...
by Izkata on Sunday June 29, 2025 @09:02PM
(#44418127)
These weren't being used in that manner though - Trump was winning on appeal, then a second court would issue the same injunction, forcing him to go through the same thing again. This ruling was needed to stop the courts from abusing their power.
Re:US Supreme Court limits federal judges' power to block Tr...
by jayd16 on Friday June 27, 2025 @09:36PM
(#44401738)
But that's fine because the executive can appeal and is in a much better position to do so, and it makes far more sense for the law to be consistent than to only benefit those with the power and time to fight back.
Since when did we start arguing that executive power must be unchecked for fear of it being slightly inconvenienced?
Re:US Supreme Court limits federal judges' power to block Tr...
by AnimalMuppet on Friday June 27, 2025 @09:52PM
(#44401803)
If you think that's what I'm arguing, you have seriously misread me.
So either a judge can block orders that exceed the president's authority and orders that are within it, or the judge can block neither.