Broken by Design: Systemd

Posted by oliverkwebb on Wednesday June 25, 2025 @04:01PM
from the ewontfix.com dept.

( 6 comments | 2 points | on HN )

Re:Broken by Design: Systemd by delusional on Wednesday June 25, 2025 @04:56PM (#44381747)

(2014)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Broken by Design: Systemd by polotics on Wednesday June 25, 2025 @05:31PM (#44382007)

can you maybe give us your opinion on what (2014) implies from your point of view?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Broken by Design: Systemd by rkomorn on Wednesday June 25, 2025 @06:07PM (#44382248)

Isn't it simply that submission titles for old articles (usually) include the year in parentheses?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Broken by Design: Systemd by PeterWhittaker on Wednesday June 25, 2025 @05:39PM (#44382050)

Perhaps the fact that it's been 11 years and systemd works pretty well?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Broken by Design: Systemd by fsflover on Wednesday June 25, 2025 @06:00PM (#44382191)

Depending on your definition of "pretty well", it may not be true. Examples:

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Broken by Design: Systemd by neilv on Wednesday June 25, 2025 @05:01PM (#44381792)

The author of systemd eventually went to work for Microsoft.

[ Parent | on HN ]