News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Broken by Design: Systemd.

Re:Broken by Design: Systemd by delusional on Wednesday June 25, 2025 @04:56PM (#44381747)
(2014)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Broken by Design: Systemd by polotics on Wednesday June 25, 2025 @05:31PM (#44382007)
can you maybe give us your opinion on what (2014) implies from your point of view?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Broken by Design: Systemd by rkomorn on Wednesday June 25, 2025 @06:07PM (#44382248)
Isn't it simply that submission titles for old articles (usually) include the year in parentheses?

eg: - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44379606

- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44379688

- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44382003

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Broken by Design: Systemd by PeterWhittaker on Wednesday June 25, 2025 @05:39PM (#44382050)
Perhaps the fact that it's been 11 years and systemd works pretty well?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Broken by Design: Systemd by fsflover on Wednesday June 25, 2025 @06:00PM (#44382191)
Depending on your definition of "pretty well", it may not be true. Examples:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43083883

https://chimera-linux.org/docs/faq#what-is-the-projects-take...

[ Parent | on HN ]