News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Endometriosis is an incredibly interesting disease by paulryanrogers on Saturday June 14, 2025 @06:18PM (#44279206)
Up to 25% of women have endo, in some communities at least.

We need more doctors. The nation has grown, our medical professionals and courts must scale up. Automation isn't going to solve everything.

Re:Endometriosis is an incredibly interesting disease by kulahan on Saturday June 14, 2025 @10:09PM (#44280083)
We need more of all healthcare professionals. Nurses and CNAs are getting run ragged just the same.
Re:Endometriosis is an incredibly interesting disease by verisimi on Sunday June 15, 2025 @05:44AM (#44281438)
Have you heard of Iatrogenesis?

https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iatrogenesis

> In 2013, an estimated 142,000 persons died from adverse effects of medical treatment, up from an estimated 94,000 in 1990.

Careful what you wish for!

And, imo, an awful lot of deaths are due to issues that cannot be classified as caused by doctors - eg dosage error over time, something that mitigates symptoms but allows the underlying to deteriorate, etc.

Re:Endometriosis is an incredibly interesting disease by jmcgough on Sunday June 15, 2025 @09:42AM (#44282250)
Most premature death in this country is from chronic disease. It's nearly impossible to get a PCP in many parts of the country. Gastroenterology is like a four month wait here.
Re:Endometriosis is an incredibly interesting disease by kulahan on Sunday June 15, 2025 @10:06PM (#44286143)
I’m very ready to have a conversation about whether or not there is a point where we should stop advancing healthcare because people probably shouldn’t be immortal, but doing it by making your healthcare workers struggle under the extreme weight of all the patients they need to care for probably is not the approach.

I simply don’t think we have the medical knowledge necessary yet to know what the “right” number of health care professionals is.

Re:Endometriosis is an incredibly interesting disease by chongli on Saturday June 14, 2025 @10:39PM (#44280171)
We need more doctors.

Yes, unfortunately we've made doctors the gatekeepers and they don't want more doctors because that will eat into their income. This happens with every single licensed occupation where the license body is run by members of the occupation, with the possible exception of bar associations.

My theory on that one is that the more lawyers you have in society the more lawyers you need because lawyers do a great job creating work for one another (both through litigation but also through legal documentation which needs to be read and interpreted by other lawyers).

Re:Endometriosis is an incredibly interesting disease by giantg2 on Sunday June 15, 2025 @08:40AM (#44282019)
The vast majority of doctors support increasing the number of doctors. Most doctors are not members of the AMA and many disagree with their positions on many subjects. The main issue with the shortage is the lack of funding for residencies that is mostly paid for by Medicare and grants. Medical schools don't want to increase the number of students if they won't have slots to finish their training to become doctors. The limits you're talking about are comparatively minor issues as the limits imposed on MDs have led to more DOs. And what nobody wants to talk about are the thousands of slots that go to international medical students, the majority of which do not stay after training.

They currently have a senate bill to increase funding and incentivize the most needed specialties (GP and psych). We'll see how that goes. At this point, it feels like interest in being a doctor has diminished - there's too much training, many specialties don't pay well enough to justify the delayed earnings and costs, the hours can be miserable, and it's a nightmare to deal with all the regulations and legal aspects.

Re:Endometriosis is an incredibly interesting disease by chongli on Sunday June 15, 2025 @09:13AM (#44282145)
The main issue with the shortage is the lack of funding for residencies

No, that’s the proximate issue. The main issue is the requirement of residencies for all doctors in the first place. In particular, I’m referring to doctors from other countries who may have years or even decades of experience practicing medicine being required to compete for residency spots. These doctors infamously end up driving for Uber instead of practicing medicine.

Re:Endometriosis is an incredibly interesting disease by nsagent on Sunday June 15, 2025 @09:34AM (#44282211)
My mom was one of those lucky few doctors that was able to redo internship and residency after moving to the US. When she first arrived she cleaned houses and worked as a waitress while awaiting entrance into a program. This was the early 80s. Of her friends, she's one of the few who was able to go through the gauntlet and become a doctor in the US. Most became other types of medical workers, including my father who became a respiratory therapist.

Contrast that to my cousin who moved to Australia and was quickly accepted as a practicing physician.

Re:Endometriosis is an incredibly interesting disease by sebmellen on Sunday June 15, 2025 @10:12AM (#44282389)
If I trained at a community hospital in Nepal, am I going to need US residency standards? We don’t know. That’s why we have standard board exams and admission pathways that all US physicians need to follow. We should not compromise on that.

We can expand US MD and US DO schools and fill our thousands of unfilled Family Medicine, Internal Medicine, and Pediatric Subspecialty residency slots first!

Re:Endometriosis is an incredibly interesting disease by chongli on Sunday June 15, 2025 @11:34AM (#44282832)
Board exams are fine. You can sit thousands of candidates for those. The issue is residency slots which are the main bottleneck. Why should a surgeon with 20 years of experience working in Mumbai be forced to become a resident alongside fresh-faced med school grads in the US? It’s a huge problem when it’s cheaper and safer to fly to India for surgery than to get the same surgery in the US (from a less experienced surgeon).

It’s the tyranny of the status quo. Milton Friedman was complaining about this more than 50 years ago.

[1] https://youtu.be/UmVrfbfKBIk

Re:Endometriosis is an incredibly interesting disease by giantg2 on Sunday June 15, 2025 @03:32PM (#44284459)
"Why should a surgeon with 20 years of experience working in Mumbai be forced to become a resident alongside fresh-faced med school grads in the US?"

Perhaps you could have them in some accelerated program, but i think it makes a lot of sense to require doctors to train or prove themselves in the specific country/region using the standard practices, tools, etc customary there. I wouldn't want a US doctor operating on me in India since they're likely to make assumptions and recommendations for treatment that overlook local practices, resources, etc.

Re:Endometriosis is an incredibly interesting disease by sebmellen on Sunday June 22, 2025 @12:43AM (#44343713)
I think this is a fundamental disagreement, not tyranny of the status quo. We have a functional medical training pipeline already that produces (arguably) the best physician population in the world. Let’s invest there.

The surgeon from Mumbai can come in and prove their worth through a surgical residency. That’s completely fair.

Re:Endometriosis is an incredibly interesting disease by voxl on Sunday June 15, 2025 @04:25AM (#44281231)
In my opinion we need to elevate doctors and invest heavily into more nurse practitioners and the like. I don't think you need to see a doctor all the time, for procedures or surgery yes, or if you need someone to actually investigate something.

But there is no point in pretending doctors are going to surge, the current administration is trying to make being a doctor harder, not easier. Doctors also avoid certain fields because it doesn't pay enough. The supply is also artificially restricted. It's a system so fucked that it's better to ignore it and pump out PRNs

Re:Endometriosis is an incredibly interesting disease by ACCount36 on Sunday June 15, 2025 @06:24AM (#44281547)
At this rate, it might be easier to train ChatGPT for better diagnostics performance and give it access to health records than to untangle decades worth of legislative and institutional inertia that prevents "more doctors".
Re:Endometriosis is an incredibly interesting disease by dirtyhippiefree on Sunday June 15, 2025 @07:24AM (#44281751)
AI hallucinating an art project is one thing…but medicine…?!?

Heaven help us.

Re:Endometriosis is an incredibly interesting disease by a_bonobo on Sunday June 15, 2025 @07:16AM (#44281717)
>Up to 25% of women have endo, in some communities at least.

I feel like that's a relatively novel insight. These days I hear about endometriosis once a month or so, mostly because of outspoken women advocates. I could swear I've never heard of endo before 2020.

As an example, the Australian National Action Plan for endometriosis is from 2018. Perhaps the currently practising generation of doctors did not have this kind of awareness during their training, and the next generation will fix it?

Re:Endometriosis is an incredibly interesting disease by jmcgough on Sunday June 15, 2025 @09:36AM (#44282219)
I think because it's seen as gyn health (though endometriosis can occur in men in rare cases), people often don't feel comfortable talking about it. Relatedly, pregnancy complications weren't really on my radar until I started working in the emergency department and discovered just how common they are.
Re:Endometriosis is an incredibly interesting disease by giantg2 on Sunday June 15, 2025 @08:06AM (#44281876)
The studies are wild. The reported range of affected individuals is 2-50% depending on which study you look at. While genetics are the main risk factor, there are all sorts of environmental risk factors that have been linked to it, especially in uetero. Many of those things are highly common such as BPA, PFAS, dioxins, and cosmetic use.