News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Jemalloc Postmortem by zozbot234 on Friday June 13, 2025 @05:56AM (#44267133)
> Still, it makes me sad to see.

I'm really not getting it, what's "sad" about this? It's just the OP maintainer saying "I can't be bothered to maintain this stuff anymore, so if you care about it, please step up, fork() the repo and do the work yourself!" Isn't that how everything FLOSS is supposed to work in the first place? I for one think it's way more "SAD!" when 100% volunteer FLOSS maintainers and developers are tacitly expected to do a whole lot more work than they're comfortable with, and then they burn out and leave the community for good.

Re:Jemalloc Postmortem by hyperpape on Friday June 13, 2025 @06:33AM (#44267287)
The maintainers are probably all making personally reasonable choices that we should support.

But it’s still sad that there’s probably no world where someone will still focus on jemalloc with professional support from their employer. It means that an important piece of technology will not continue improving.

Forking is possible, but it doesn’t look like the kind of project that many people could fork and improve, it requires a lot of focus by people with specific domain knowledge.

Re:Jemalloc Postmortem by 7bit on Friday June 13, 2025 @06:43AM (#44267350)
I don't understand why you don't understand that you can be sad about this.

Parent stated that he's sad the project is no longer maintained. That's a perfectly reasonable and human response. Parent does not have to defend having an emotion, even less provide objective truth for why he feels sad.

If you don't agree, fine. But I don't see why one would write a paragraph long statement, I validating someone's emotional response.

Re:Jemalloc Postmortem by zozbot234 on Friday June 13, 2025 @06:58AM (#44267422)
> That's a perfectly reasonable and human response.

It's hardly a reasonable response. By casually saying that it's "sad" when a maintainer gives up on a project, GP is also including a very real and heavy implication that this is somehow wrong on their part and that they should continue to shoulder that burden, as a demand from the community. This is a really unhealthy attitude and we should all do away with it. Instead, just acknowledge that the project is now there for the taking by anyone who may be interested. There's nothing "sad!" about this whatsoever, and we should not pretend that there is.

Re:Jemalloc Postmortem by lukeasrodgers on Friday June 13, 2025 @07:34AM (#44267590)
If my kid is sad that she cannot have an extra granola bar, that does not imply that I am wrong to deny her, or even that she thinks I am wrong, it just means she wishes she could have one.
Re:Jemalloc Postmortem by zozbot234 on Friday June 13, 2025 @07:42AM (#44267627)
Sure, but this whole forum is more like your kid going on Twitter and yapping "I can't have an extra granola bar? That's SO SAD! Unfair!" I'm just saying that it's not only about feeling an emotion, there's lots of extra implications to it and most of them are not very good.
Re:Jemalloc Postmortem by pvg on Friday June 13, 2025 @10:17AM (#44268754)
You don't really get to decide whether someone's entirely in-passing mention of an emotional response to developments in something they worked on is 'reasonable' or not, and more importantly, it's not at all a topic of interesting conversation, just pedantic nitpicking.
[dead]
Re:Jemalloc Postmortem by pvg on Friday June 13, 2025 @10:43AM (#44268980)
Project participants showing up to HN to discuss their work is one of the more interesting and valuable things we have here and a 'community norm' in which they start getting hectored over tiny details or pet issues unrelated to the work would not be a good one - it just drives people away.
Re:Jemalloc Postmortem by zozbot234 on Friday June 13, 2025 @11:12AM (#44269272)
Fully agreed! Thanks for providing your own perspective.