Re:Frequent reauth doesn't make you more secure
by flerchin on Thursday June 12, 2025 @07:35PM
(#44264342)
Last time I brought this to our cyber folks, they pointed out that PCI standards require password rotation. So it depends upon which auditors you care about more.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Frequent reauth doesn't make you more secure
by clwg on Thursday June 12, 2025 @07:56PM
(#44264444)
This requirement is in section 8.3.9 of the PCI DSS[0], and only applies to single-factor authentication implementations, two-factor auth removes this requirement.
[0] https://docs-prv.pcisecuritystandards.org/PCI%20DSS/Standard...
Re:Frequent reauth doesn't make you more secure
by throwaway72046 on Thursday June 12, 2025 @08:23PM
(#44264594)
Your broker/bank still needs to do it, unfortunately... someone please fix this :(
[0] https://www.finra.org/filing-reporting/entitlement/password-...
Re:Frequent reauth doesn't make you more secure
by Mtinie on Thursday June 12, 2025 @09:19PM
(#44264859)
> If the password length is 12 to 15 characters, it will be valid for 180 days
> If the password length is 16 to 32 characters, it will be valid for 365 days
Madness.
Re:Frequent reauth doesn't make you more secure
by lofties on Friday June 13, 2025 @12:55AM
(#44265793)
I'm a big fan of "should not include profanity, words of a vulgar nature". It's not unthinkable my password manager comes up with a chain of letters that at one point will include "fuck".
Re:Frequent reauth doesn't make you more secure
by tiltowait on Friday June 13, 2025 @01:07AM
(#44265846)
This comment reminded me of a talk I saw[1] about Apple's password generation algorithm. Apparently (and unsurprisingly), they have a list of offensive terms the system is designed to avoid. I expect this is common-enough practice in most popular password managers, but probably not all.
Re:Frequent reauth doesn't make you more secure
by notpushkin on Friday June 13, 2025 @02:05AM
(#44266082)
It would be fun to make a passphrase generator that always includes a profanity.
Re:Frequent reauth doesn't make you more secure
by HPsquared on Friday June 13, 2025 @03:35AM
(#44266519)
So long as they factor that into the "bits of entropy" calculation.
Re:Frequent reauth doesn't make you more secure
by yencabulator on Saturday June 14, 2025 @12:01PM
(#44277152)
Dibs for calling it misenthropy. Entropy mixed with misantrophy.
Re:Frequent reauth doesn't make you more secure
by zavec on Tuesday June 17, 2025 @12:11PM
(#44300760)
Now I'm trying to remember where I read the story about somebody who was in a programming class and was writing some program that took user input, and figured that it should be smart enough not to repeat curse words. So they started writing down all the curse words it should know not to say, and that was about the extent of what they had done when the teacher came around to see how everything was going.
Re:Frequent reauth doesn't make you more secure
by WarOnPrivacy on Friday June 13, 2025 @01:38PM
(#44270508)
> I'm a big fan of "should not include profanity, words of a vulgar nature".
On my first Wireguard testbed, WG's keygen dropped one at the front of the key. It remains my most treasured digital possession.
Re:Frequent reauth doesn't make you more secure
by seadan83 on Friday June 13, 2025 @03:01PM
(#44271247)
It kinda is good personal policy IMO for passwords you have to type to be positive affirmations. I used 'Fuckthis1!' for a moment; funny enough it was not the most moralizing thing to type all the time! OTOH, 'H@ppyH@ppyJoyJoy!!' was always a small mood lift.
Re:Frequent reauth doesn't make you more secure
by andrewaylett on Friday June 13, 2025 @11:09PM
(#44273935)
Word list based passphrases mostly avoid this, by not including those words. Which still doesn't mean you won't get something offensive, of course, it'll just be a string of four words instead of four letters.